Skip to content 
The Perpetrator
Frank DeLeon Jr. is primarily recognized in connection with the heartbreaking murder of 15-year-old Diamond Alvarez in January 2022. When the incident occurred, DeLeon was just 17 and identified as Alvarez’s boyfriend. Following her death, he emerged as the key figure in the criminal investigation surrounding the case.
The Crime
Diamond Alvarez, a 16-year-old girl from Houston, Texas, was tragically murdered on January 11, 2022. The crime occurred in the evening in a southwest Houston neighborhood. Alvarez was walking her family’s dog, Peanut, when the incident took place.
The primary suspect in the case is Frank Deleon Jr., who was 17 years old at the time of the crime. Allegedly, he was Alvarez’s boyfriend. Authorities believe the motive behind the crime relates to a love triangle. After discovering Deleon’s involvement with someone else, Alvarez decided to confront him.
On the evening of January 11, Alvarez had received a text message from Deleon, asking her to meet him at a nearby park located in the 15400 block of Park Manor.
Unaware of his intentions, she left her home to meet him, taking Peanut with her. It was during this meeting that the tragic incident occurred. During this time, her family heard the sound of gunfire. Tragically, they later discovered Alvarez’s body in a nearby field.
Bond And Missing Court Dates
Frank Deleon was initially charged with murder six days after the incident and was granted house arrest following the posting of a $250,000 bond.
In March, DeLeon was accused of breaching his bond conditions. His legal representation asserted that he had left his residence to visit a local church. However, Alvarez’s family expressed skepticism about this justification, pointing out that the supposed violation occurred on a Monday, a day when the church is typically closed. Alvarez’s aunt questioned the validity of this explanation, stating, “I want to know if that church was really open on Monday for that killer to be released today. We need proof.”
Upon DeLeon’s arrest on Monday for the bond violation, the Alvarez family shared their sentiments with the media, expressing a sense of relief and satisfaction knowing that DeLeon was in custody and no longer a threat to their safety.
The family also highlighted the proximity of DeLeon’s residence to their own, noting that it is just a two-minute distance. Machado, a family member, described their emotional reaction to the news at a press conference on Tuesday, saying, “It was relief. I cried. I screamed.”
Deleon’s defense lawyer stated that his client was involved in a vehicular accident on the way to court on Monday, resulting in a serious head injury that may necessitate medical treatment. This was corroborated by a representative from the District Attorney’s office, who confirmed that Deleon was under custody at a nearby hospital.
The commencement of jury selection, initially scheduled for Monday, has been postponed due to Deleon’s nonattendance. Steve Walsh, an Assistant District Attorney at the Harris County District Attorney’s Office, mentioned that before the trial can proceed, Deleon is required to appear before a judge for a review of his bond status.
The Evidence
Evidence collected by the police led to the arrest of Frank Deleon Jr. He was charged with murder. The evidence included text messages between Alvarez and Deleon, which helped establish the timeline and motive for the crime. Additionally, surveillance footage from the area played a crucial role in the investigation.
Text Messages
A significant part of the evidence comes from text messages exchanged between Alvarez and Deleon. These messages were pivotal in establishing the timeline of events and the motive. Deleon’s texts, where he pleaded with Alvarez not to disclose their relationship to another girl he was involved with, were particularly telling.
Witness Testimonies
The statements and testimonies from Alvarez’s family and possibly from the other girl involved in the love triangle are important. These testimonies provide context and background to the relationship dynamics and events leading up to the incident.
Surveillance Footage
Video surveillance from the area where the murder took place has been crucial. This footage can provide insights into the movements of Alvarez and Deleon on the night of the murder and potentially capture the crime itself.
Forensic Evidence
At the crime scene, investigators found shell casings which were analyzed for ballistic evidence. This evidence is key in linking the weapon used to the suspect. Additionally, forensic analysis of the wounds on Alvarez’s body provides insights into the nature of the attack.
GPS Monitoring Data
Deleon’s GPS monitor, which he was required to wear as part of his bond conditions, is another piece of evidence. While there were issues with a supposed glitch in the system, the data from this device remains viable. It can be utilized to track his movements and establish his whereabouts at key times.
Defendant’s Statements
Statements made by Deleon, including his claims of Alvarez stalking him and his activities on the night of the shooting, form part of the evidence. His claims about disposing of a firearm are also significant.
Other Digital Evidence
Investigators might have also examined other forms of digital evidence, such as call logs, social media activity, and location data from Alvarez’s and Deleon’s phones.
Medical Reports
The autopsy report of Alvarez and any medical examination reports related to Deleon’s alleged head injury from a car accident are also part of the evidence.
Weapon Ownership and Disposal Claims
Deleon admitted to previously owning a 9mm gun. He claimed to have gotten rid of it. This admission is an important piece of evidence, especially in the context of the shell casings found at the scene.
Each piece of evidence contributes to creating a comprehensive picture of the events leading to Alvarez’s death. In criminal cases, the strength and reliability of evidence are critical in establishing guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In this case, the combination of digital, forensic, and testimonial evidence forms the backbone of the prosecution’s case against Deleon.
Alvarez Family Insights and Evidence
Alvarez’s sister shared that her sister had been in a relationship with Deleon Jr. for around six months before it ended. On January 9, two days before the tragic incident, Deleon Jr. sent desperate texts to Alvarez. He pleaded with her not to disclose their relationship to another girl he was involved with. He repeatedly texted, “Don’t ruin this for me.”
The sister recounted that when Alvarez agreed to meet Deleon Jr. at around 9:30 p.m. at a park in the 15400 block of Park Manor, she advised Alvarez against it. According to prosecutors, Alvarez texted her sister saying, “We came to the field. I told him, I would only talk to him in the field.”
Alvarez’s mother, worried, tried calling her but received no response. The family’s discovery of Peanut alone heightened their concern. Upon searching the neighborhood, they found Alvarez’s body in a field.
In a previous report, it was mentioned that Alvarez, just 16 years old, was shot 22 times while walking her dog.
Prosecutors revealed that they found 10 shell casings near Alvarez’s body. Most gunshot wounds indicated that she was lying on her back when someone shot her.
DeLeon Recount Of The Relationship
In court, Deleon Jr. claimed he and Alvarez were only casually seeing each other and alleged that Alvarez was stalking him, claiming no communication since January 8. On the night of the shooting, he said he was headed to a convenience store but stopped. Prosecutors noted that Deleon Jr. had recently owned a 9mm gun, which he claimed to have disposed of before the New Year.
The Other Girlfriend
Further complicating the case, prosecutors mentioned that Deleon Jr.’s other girlfriend reported a history of violence in their relationship, including an incident where he allegedly pulled out a gun on her. This girlfriend also confirmed an altercation at a Quinceañera and said she had texted Alvarez on the day of the shooting about her relationship with Deleon Jr., even sending screenshots of this conversation to him.
Courtroom Dynamics and Outburst
The emotionally charged nature of the case was evident in the courtroom. In high-profile cases involving violent crimes, especially those with young victims, courtroom atmospheres can be tense and volatile. The outburst in court, details of which are crucial to understand the emotional landscape of the proceedings, likely stemmed from the intense feelings of grief, anger, and frustration experienced by the victim’s family and community. Such outbursts, while not uncommon in emotionally charged cases, can impact the proceedings by introducing an element of unpredictability and heightened emotion.
Impact of Public Opinion and Media Coverage
High-profile cases often attract significant media attention, which can influence public opinion. The court must ensure that such attention does not compromise the fairness of the proceedings and the rights of the accused.
Guilty Plea and Sentencing
DeLeon later pleaded guilty to the murder of Diamond Alvarez and was sentenced to 45 years in prison, he was at risk of receiving a life sentence. The plea and sentencing were marked by emotional responses from Alvarez’s family and observers, reflecting the profound impact of the crime on the community.
In exchange for waiving these rights, defendants often receive some benefits in a plea deal, such as a reduced sentence or the dropping of some charges. In high-stakes cases where a defendant faces a potential life sentence, accepting a plea deal for a lesser sentence can present a more favorable outcome.
By agreeing to this plea deal, Deleon forfeits the right to appeal his conviction. Additionally, he must serve a minimum of 22 and a half years before becoming eligible for parole.
Waving The Right To Appeal
By pleading guilty, Deleon acknowledges his responsibility for the crime and accepts the conviction. In doing so, he relinquishes the right to challenge the conviction later through an appeal. An appeal is a legal process where a higher court reviews the decision of a lower court for legal errors.
Public Response
The case stirred public reaction, highlighting issues related to juvenile crime, violence in relationships among teenagers, and the criminal justice system’s handling of such cases.
Frank DeLeon Jr.’s actions and the subsequent legal proceedings have thus made him a figure of public interest, primarily in the context of this tragic event. His story serves as a grim reminder of the consequences of violent crime and its far-reaching impact on families and communities.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the tragic murder of Diamond Alvarez highlights the serious impact of youth violence. Additionally, they reveal the complexities of teenage relationships. As the investigation continues, it emphasizes the urgent need for community awareness and intervention to prevent such devastating incidents in the future.
Furthermore, this case serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of addressing the factors that contribute to violence among youth. It is essential to ensure that justice is served for the victims and their families. Ultimately, resolving this case will seek accountability while fostering a broader conversation about safety and support for young individuals.
Need Help? Call Us Now!
Do not forget that when you or anyone you know is facing a criminal charge, you have us, the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, by your side to help you build the best defense case for you. Rest assured, our team is dedicated to working in your best interest to achieve the most favorable outcome for you. We can provide comprehensive explanations regarding your trial and the most effective defense strategies. Let us guide you through each step of the criminal process, ensuring you are well-prepared and supported along the way.
Therefore, do not hesitate to call us if you find yourself or someone you know who is facing criminal charges unsure about the court system. We will work with you to give you the best type of defense that can help you solve your case. It is vital to have someone explain the result of the charge to you and guide you in the best possible way.
At the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, our team comprises professional and knowledgeable criminal law attorneys. They have extensive experience in crafting a defense case tailored to your needs. We aim to secure the best possible outcome for you, prioritizing your interests throughout the legal process.
You can also schedule a free consultation at your convenience at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan. You may choose to have your appointment via Zoom, Google Meet, email, or an in-person appointment; and we will provide you with as much advice and information as possible so you can have the best possible result in your case, whether it’s similar to the case of Diamond Alvarez or any other legal matter.
Call us now at (281) 810-9760.
Other Related Articles
- How Long is Probation For Domestic Violence in Texas?
- Removing Yourself from a Marriage Affected by Domestic Violence
- Domestic violence: An overview for Texas divorces
- Mental impairments, family violence and how these problems affect child custody cases
- Approaching a CPS case in Texas as a teenaged parent or as a parent who is in jail
- Surviving a Digital Nightmare: The Risks of Online Dating
- The Reality of the Criminal Justice System in Today’s Time
- The Ins and Outs of Plea Bargaining in Texas Criminal Cases
- The Criminal Process Guide
- The Role Of Plea Bargains In Drug Cases In Texas
FAQs on Diamond Alvarez
A guilty plea indicates the defendant’s admission to the crime, waiving their right to trial and potentially benefiting from a plea bargain.
Consequences include a possible reduced sentence through a plea bargain, but also loss of rights such as appealing the conviction.
Generally, a guilty plea involves waiving the right to appeal the conviction, though appeals on limited grounds like sentencing errors may be possible.
A guilty plea leads directly to a sentencing hearing, bypassing the need for a trial to establish guilt.
Plea bargaining involves negotiation for a lesser charge or sentence in exchange for a guilty plea, often resulting in a quicker, more certain case resolution.
