What Is CrowdStrike?
CrowdStrike is a prominent American cybersecurity technology company that specializes in endpoint security, threat intelligence, and cyberattack response services. Founded in 2011 by George Kurtz, Dmitri Alperovitch, and Gregg Marston, the company has rapidly grown to become one of the most influential players in the cybersecurity industry. CrowdStrike’s headquarters is located in Sunnyvale, California, but its operations span globally, serving thousands of clients across various sectors, including finance, healthcare, retail, and government.
Provides The Falcon Platform
At the core of CrowdStrike’s offerings is its Falcon platform, a cloud-native endpoint protection solution designed to detect, prevent, and respond to a wide range of cyber threats. The platform utilizes artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to identify malicious activities, providing real-time threat detection and automated protection. This approach enables CrowdStrike to deliver high efficacy in preventing breaches, even in the face of increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks.
CrowdStrike Outage
On July 19, 2024, a massive IT outage occurred when a faulty update to CrowdStrike’s Falcon Sensor software caused widespread system failures on computers running Microsoft Windows. Designed to protect against cyber threats, the software inadvertently crashed about 8.5 million systems worldwide, marking one of the largest outages in IT history. Consequently, the impact spread across various industries, including airlines, airports, banks, healthcare, retail, and government services. This incident led to an estimated financial loss of at least $10 billion globally.
How The Outage Happened
The issue started with a configuration update that caused an out-of-bounds memory read error in the Windows sensor client, resulting in invalid page faults. Consequently, systems entered a boot loop or booted into recovery mode, severely disrupting operations for businesses relying on Windows infrastructure. The update affected Windows 10 and 11 systems, which are primarily used by organizations. In contrast, personal computers running other operating systems like macOS and Linux remained unaffected.
Despite a quick response from CrowdStrike, who reverted the update within hours and issued a fix, many systems required manual intervention to restore. This included rebooting affected machines multiple times, often needing local access due to complexities like BitLocker encryption keys. As a result, the remediation process extended over several days, further exacerbating the situation for affected organizations.
CrowdStrike Stocks Drop Due to The Outage
Financially, the incident had an immediate impact on CrowdStrike’s stock price, which plummeted by over 11% on the day of the outage. The market’s reaction underscored the gravity of the situation, as investors quickly lost confidence in the company’s ability to secure its platform and maintain service reliability. The lawsuit contends that this loss in stock value reflects the company’s failure to manage risk properly and provide transparent communication about its operational challenges.
The legal action taken by the shareholders also reflects broader concerns about accountability and transparency in the tech industry, particularly for companies that play a crucial role in cybersecurity. As businesses increasingly rely on digital infrastructure, the expectations for cybersecurity providers like CrowdStrike are heightened. The lawsuit raises questions about how companies disclose potential risks to investors and manage the balance between innovation and security in their product offerings.
CrowdStrike Sent Out Uber Vouchers
Following the widespread IT outage caused by a faulty software update from CrowdStrike, the company’s attempt to mitigate the situation included offering $10 UberEats vouchers as compensation to affected customers and partners. This gesture was quickly met with widespread criticism and ridicule, as many saw it as an inadequate response to the magnitude of the disruption caused by the outage. The backlash highlighted the disconnect between the perceived severity of the incident and CrowdStrike’s effort to address the inconvenience faced by millions worldwide.
Meant As A Token Of Good Will
CrowdStrike likely intended the decision to offer $10 UberEats vouchers as a small token of goodwill, aiming to provide immediate relief to individuals inconvenienced by the outage. However, given the scale and impact of the incident, which disrupted critical services across multiple sectors including healthcare, transportation, and finance, many saw this gesture as insufficient. Consequently, numerous businesses suffered significant operational disruptions, financial losses, and reputational damage. This led to widespread frustration and dissatisfaction with what was perceived as a trivial compensation offer.
Faced Criticism Over the Voucher
For many, the offer of a $10 food voucher seemed almost insulting, given the outage’s global impact, which affected millions of systems and resulted in an estimated financial loss of at least $10 billion. The response from customers and industry observers was largely negative, with many taking to social media to express their displeasure. Some critics argued that the gesture trivialized the inconvenience and financial losses experienced by businesses and individuals who relied on CrowdStrike’s cybersecurity solutions.
The Outage Hit Airports Hard
The 2024 CrowdStrike outage, triggered by a faulty software update to the company’s Falcon Sensor, significantly impacted multiple sectors globally. However, the aviation industry was perhaps the most severely affected. As the software issue unfolded, it caused critical failures in Microsoft Windows operating systems, leading to widespread disruptions that reverberated across the globe. This incident underscored the vulnerabilities inherent in the sector’s heavy reliance on complex IT systems for operations and communications.
Delta Sues Prepares to Sue CrowdStrike
In preparation for potential legal action against CrowdStrike following the massive IT outage in July 2024, Delta Air Lines has hired the prominent litigator David Boies and his law firm, Boies Schiller Flexner, to spearhead their legal strategy. The decision to bring on such a high-profile legal team underscores the seriousness with which Delta is approaching this case and reflects the significant financial and reputational stakes involved. David Boies is well-known in the legal world for his involvement in numerous high-profile cases, and his firm’s expertise in handling complex litigation makes it a fitting choice for Delta as they navigate the intricacies of their case against CrowdStrike.
A Seasoned Attorney, David Boies
David Boies, a seasoned attorney, has built a reputation for tackling challenging legal battles. Notably, he represented the U.S. government in its antitrust suit against Microsoft in the late 1990s and Al Gore in the Bush v. Gore case following the 2000 U.S. presidential election. His extensive experience and legal acumen have made him an influential figure in the legal community. Therefore, Delta’s selection of Boies suggests that the airline is committed to pursuing all available legal avenues to seek redress for the disruption and financial losses it suffered.
Known For His Expertise in Litigation and High Stakes Disputes
Boies Schiller Flexner, the law firm led by David Boies, is known for its expertise in complex litigation and high-stakes disputes. The firm’s extensive experience in commercial litigation, particularly in cases involving technology and cybersecurity, positions it well to handle Delta’s claims against CrowdStrike. Given the technical and legal complexities of the case, Boies Schiller Flexner’s ability to navigate intricate legal frameworks and advocate effectively on behalf of its clients will be crucial as Delta seeks compensation for the estimated $500 million loss resulting from the outage.
Delta Wants to Hold CrowdStrike Accountable
Delta’s decision to hire such a high-caliber legal team signals its determination to hold CrowdStrike accountable for the outage’s impact on its operations. Moreover, Delta’s CEO, Ed Bastian, has publicly stated that the company is not seeking to destroy CrowdStrike but rather to ensure it receives fair compensation for the substantial disruptions and financial losses incurred. The legal strategy will likely focus on issues such as negligence, breach of contract, and failure to meet industry standards in cybersecurity practices, areas where Boies and his team excel.
As Delta prepares its case, Boies Schiller Flexner’s involvement may also influence the broader legal landscape surrounding cybersecurity liability. The outcome of this potential lawsuit could set important precedents for assigning responsibility in cases of massive IT failures. Consequently, it could drive changes in how companies structure their contracts with cybersecurity providers. Furthermore, it may prompt greater scrutiny of cybersecurity practices and encourage more stringent standards and oversight to prevent similar incidents in the future.
Lost Approximately $500 Million
Following the massive IT outage caused by CrowdStrike’s faulty software update in July 2024, Delta Air Lines faced significant operational disruptions that led to the cancellation of over 5,000 flights. As a result, thousands of passengers were stranded, and the airline had to address the immediate challenges of customer dissatisfaction and compensation claims. The compensation strategy Delta adopted in response to the crisis was multifaceted, aiming to appease affected customers and restore confidence in the airline’s services.
Delta Offered Compensation To Flyers
Delta provided several forms of compensation to passengers whose flights were canceled or severely delayed due to the outage. Primarily, they offered travel vouchers as compensation. These vouchers, typically valued between $100 and $500, served both as a gesture of goodwill and as an incentive for future travel with Delta. Additionally, the value of these vouchers varied based on factors such as the duration of the delay, the distance of the affected flight, and the class of service booked by the passenger.
Provided Full Refunds to Flyers
Delta also issued refunds to passengers who chose not to rebook their flights or experienced significant delays. Additionally, the airline adhered to regulatory guidelines requiring compensation for canceled flights, thus ensuring passengers had the option to receive a full refund for their unused tickets. This was particularly important for international travelers, who are entitled to specific rights and compensation under regulations like the European Union’s EC 261/2004, which mandates compensation for flight disruptions.
Helped Provide Accommodations To Flyers
Furthermore, Delta extended accommodations to passengers stranded due to the outage. The airline arranged for hotel stays and meal vouchers for travelers who were left without lodging options, especially in cases where the disruption forced them to remain overnight at airports. Transportation to and from airports was also provided, aiming to alleviate some of the inconveniences caused by the unexpected travel disruptions.
Delta’s approach to compensation also included offering miles to members of its SkyMiles loyalty program. Frequent flyers affected by the cancellations received additional miles credited to their accounts, providing an incentive for continued loyalty despite the disruption. This strategy not only helped to retain existing customers but also served as a valuable tool in rebuilding trust and customer satisfaction.
Lost The Ability to Manage Their Operation
The outage severely affected Delta due to its heavy reliance on CrowdStrike’s cybersecurity solutions and Microsoft platforms. Consequently, Delta’s crew-tracking system, a critical tool for coordinating pilots and flight attendants, experienced significant disruptions. This made it impossible for the airline to effectively manage its operations. Moreover, Delta’s reliance on external vendors for mission-critical functions amplified the impact of the outage. As a result, Delta struggled to restore normalcy amidst widespread system failures.
Had To Reset Its Servers to Bring It Back Online
In response to the crisis, Delta had to manually reset 40,000 servers to bring its operations back online. Despite these efforts, the airline faced not only immediate financial losses but also long-term reputational harm. The U.S. Department of Transportation is also investigating Delta’s response to the outage, which adds another layer of complexity to the airline’s challenges.
Although Delta has not yet officially filed a lawsuit, the airline has hired prominent litigator David Boies in preparation for potential legal action against CrowdStrike. Furthermore, Bastian emphasized the importance of thorough testing and accountability. He stated that vendors providing essential technology services to Delta must ensure reliability and be prepared to address issues promptly.
Is CrowdStrike Liable
In the aftermath of the 2024 CrowdStrike outage, Delta Air Lines has been exploring legal avenues to hold the cybersecurity company accountable for the significant disruptions it caused. While Delta has not yet officially filed a lawsuit, it is preparing to seek compensation for the estimated $500 million in losses incurred during the outage. The question of whether CrowdStrike can be considered liable in the potential Delta lawsuit is complex and involves multiple legal, contractual, and technical factors.
Liability Depends on The Terms And Conditions
From a legal standpoint, liability in this case would depend on the specific terms and conditions outlined in the contractual agreement between Delta and CrowdStrike. Most software and cybersecurity service agreements include clauses that limit liability for service outages, often capping compensation at the fees paid for the services. However, Delta’s situation is unique due to the massive scale of the disruption and the significant financial and reputational damage it suffered. If Delta can demonstrate that CrowdStrike failed to meet contractual obligations or industry standards in maintaining and updating its software, it could potentially argue for a breach of contract, which may open the door for compensation beyond the typical limitations.
Did CrowdStrike Attempt Due Diligence
Determining liability involves assessing whether CrowdStrike exercised due diligence in its software update processes. A faulty update to the Falcon Sensor caused the outage, leading to widespread system failures for many businesses, including Delta. If investigators prove that CrowdStrike did not follow best practices in testing and deploying the update, such as conducting adequate risk assessments or providing sufficient fail-safes, this could support Delta’s claims of negligence. Furthermore, Delta’s reliance on CrowdStrike for critical cybersecurity functions places a heightened responsibility on CrowdStrike to ensure its solutions are reliable and robust against such failures.
Is CrowdStrike Consider Negligent?
The legal arguments in this case would likely revolve around whether CrowdStrike’s actions constituted negligence or a failure to meet a duty of care owed to Delta. In the context of cybersecurity, establishing negligence involves proving that the service provider did not act in accordance with established industry standards. If Delta can demonstrate that CrowdStrike’s practices were deficient, it may have a stronger case for liability.
Delta Damaged Reputation Can Have Influence
Another factor influencing the liability discussion is the potential for reputational harm and subsequent financial losses experienced by Delta. The outage occurred during a peak travel period, exacerbating the impact on Delta’s operations and customer relationships. This aspect of the case highlights the broader implications of cybersecurity failures, where the consequences extend beyond immediate technical disruptions to long-term brand damage and customer trust.
Regulatory considerations could also play a role in determining CrowdStrike’s liability. Depending on the jurisdictions involved, regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union may impose additional requirements for cybersecurity service providers. If CrowdStrike’s actions are found to have violated regulatory standards, this could further support Delta’s claims.
Need Help? Call Us Now!
Do not forget that when you or anyone you know is facing a criminal charge, you have us, the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, by your side to help you build the best defense case for you. We will work and be in your best interest for you and we will obtain the best possible outcome that can benefit you.
Our team is here to explain your trial, guiding you through the criminal justice process with clarity and support every step of the way. If you’re navigating the complexities of criminal charges and the court system seems daunting, reach out.
Therefore, do not hesitate to call us if you find yourself or someone you know that is facing criminal charges unsure about the court system. We will work with you to give you the best type of defense that can help you solve your case. It is vital to have someone explain the result of the charge to you and guide you in the best possible way.
Here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, our professional and knowledgeable criminal law attorneys build a defense case that suits your needs, aiming for the best possible outcome to benefit you.
Also, here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, you are given a free consultation at your convenience. You may choose to have your appointment via Zoom, google meet, email, or an in-person appointment; and we will provide you with as much advice and information as possible so you can have the best possible result in your case.
Call us now at (281) 810-9760.
Other Related Articles
- Navigating the Legal Landscape: A Comprehensive Guide to Texas Cyber Bullying Laws
- What Is a White-Collar Crime in Texas?
- Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Laws: Protecting Your Business and Clients
- The Role of Technology in Combating Stolen ID: Innovations and Challenges
- Revealing Scandal: Troubled Teens Saved From Nightmare Academy
- Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Laws: Protecting Your Business and Clients
- Launching Lawsuit Against CenterPoint After Hurricane Beryl Disaster
- The Proud Boys: Facing Justice in the Nation’s Courts
Delta’s Lawsuit Against CrowdStrike – FAQs
Delta is considering suing CrowdStrike due to a massive IT outage caused by a faulty software update from CrowdStrike, which led to significant disruptions in Delta’s operations and an estimated $500 million in losses.
The outage forced Delta to cancel over 5,000 flights, leaving thousands of passengers stranded and causing major disruptions to its crew-tracking system, which is critical for coordinating pilots and flight attendants with flights.
Delta has hired David Boies, a prominent litigator, and his law firm Boies Schiller Flexner, to handle the potential lawsuit against CrowdStrike.
Delta provided several forms of compensation including travel vouchers valued between $100 and $500, refunds, hotel accommodations, meal vouchers, and additional miles credited to loyalty accounts for affected passengers.
The question of CrowdStrike’s liability is complex and depends on contractual terms, technical practices, and regulatory compliance. Delta may argue negligence and breach of contract, but the outcome depends on legal arguments and evidence presented in court.
Hey there! My name is Olivia Ramirez, I graduated from Sam Houston State University with a bachelor’s of science in Psychology. I can’t help but scour the web for crime news and interesting stories. I write mostly true crime, anything from white collar crimes to the tragic murders across America. I try to mix in local news updates with big hitting scandals.
When I’m not typing away or searching for crime news, you’ll find me in bookstores looking for the new books to add to my backlog. Hanging out with my family or just relaxing with some cozy games to unwind from the day.
