If you are a parent going through a divorce, you know there are three main goals: dividing property, assets, or debts; child custody; and child support. Of these three, many people are concerned with the custody battle that is to come. Most parents believe they are the better parent and fit for their child, and not to mention the parent with custody is typically awarded child support.
This blog will explain what factors go into considering custody and how that will be decided. However, to begin, you will need to understand just what exactly possession is to know what is best for the child.
What does it mean to have “Custody?”
Two main terms to familiarize yourself with when thinking about child custody are conservatorship and possession and access. Most people will use the terms interchangeably, but it is essential to know these are not the same, and you should be aware of these terms.
First, conservatorship is best described as what rights and duties a parent will have regarding their children. Rights and responsibilities are reserved for responsible parents to make life decisions for the child. Examples of rights can include having the right to be made aware of your child’s doctor’s appointment and the right to attend. Lastly, there are many duties a parent has in making choices for the child, and those duties can be about schooling, medical decisions, psychiatric, etc.
There are two types of conservatorship: sole managing and joint conservatorship. In sole custody, only one parent will have the rights and duties about a child’s life decisions. These rights and responsibilities will be shared in a joint managing conservatorship. It is also essential to know that if you are in a sole managing conservatorship, this will not affect what possession and access may be ordered.
Possession and Access
On the other hand, most people would associate the term custody with what is known as possession and access. This is the legal term referring to when a parent will exercise physical custody of the child or when they will visit their child. In Texas, there are two main statutory schedules for possession and access: standard and extended standard. These schedules will determine how much time each parent will have with the child. We will not discuss these schedules in detail but rather another blog focusing on how custody is awarded.
Now that you understand what custody consists of, many people want to know: who will get possession of the child? While not all parents will agree on who the child should live with, it is helpful to know that this battle will go to a Texas Family Law court, where it will be examined and ruled case-by-case basis. These rulings can vary widely because every family will have a unique set of circumstances to be considered.
Best Interest of the Child
To begin with, determining how a court will rule, you should be aware of the legal courts will base their decisions on. This standard is known as the “Best Interest of the Child” standard. Although self-explanatory, this means precisely that. Regardless of what each parent wants or how hard they fight, the judge will only base his decision on the child’s best interest.
After all, no children were born into this world expecting to grow up in a broken home, and their specific needs, wants, and wishes should be considered when there is a huge decision that can affect them for the rest of their life.
Texas is NOT a “Mother State”…Kinda
Contrary to popular belief, Texas is NOT specifically a “Mother State.” This means that either a mother or father of a child can be awarded custody of their child if it is in the child’s best interest. However, this only pertains to parents that are either officially married or common-law married.
Things are a bit different when a mother is not married. In Texas, the mother will assume sole custody of the child and have the rights and duties to make all legal decisions for the child. A father cannot fight for custody of his child until his paternity has been established.
Factors Considered in Awarding Custody
The Texas case of Holley v. Adams helped establish what is known as the “best interest factors” that are frequently considered when deciding how custody should be awarded. Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367 (Tex. 1976). Although these are just frequently considered factors, each unique set of circumstances will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Nonetheless, this landmark case has helped set a guideline for what a court should consider when determining a child’s best interest.
These “Holley Factors” are:
- Desires of the child
Most children cannot make life decisions for themselves, and however, if you have a child over the age of 12, they can interview the judge and express their wishes on custody. Either party will have to move for this interview, and this will only be considered by the judge as the child will not automatically get to decide where they will live.
- Emotional and physical needs of the child, now and in the future
A kid’s childhood is one of the most essential times in their life for their development, and the judge will consider that in hopes of satisfying those needs as close to how they were pre-divorce.
- Emotional and physical dangers to a child, now and in the future
A judge will want to place a child in a healthy living environment and assess any short-term or potential hazards to a child. Also, if a parent has a criminal record, particularly in abuse, these are extensively considered when deciding custody.
- Parenting abilities of the parent or individual seeking custody
It would not make much sense for a judge to give a parent custody who has not been actively involved in the child’s daily physical and emotional needs. It also would not make sense to provide a child for a parent who is constantly absent for work or travel. Interactions with your child will also be weighed. If these needs were equally balanced, a court would likely want to keep that split balance.
- Programs to help custodial parents foster the best interest of the child
If a child is very active in their community through sports, church, or other civic programs, a court will use that evidence to help weigh what parent should get custody. A parent who cannot keep their child active in the community would be considered because it’s crucial for healthy social development.
- Plans for the child by the parents, individuals, or agency seeking custody
Parents in a contested custody battle are urged to work out a parenting plan that works for both the parents and children involved. A court will keep in mind which parent was willing to cooperate to reach a result versus a parent unwilling to cooperate.
- Stability in the home and proposed placement location
Developing routines and a stable home environment are essential for a child’s health. The family home and who is awarded that home will be taken into consideration when awarding custody. Most judges will not want to disrupt the balance a child has grown into in their life. Change can be a challenging concept for a child to grasp, and a court will promote continuity of those routines and patterns.
- Acts or omissions by a parent indicating an improper parent-child relationship
Abuse and neglect of a child’s needs will be significantly taken into consideration when deciding custody. It certainly would not be in a child’s best interest to be with a parent who harms them emotionally or physically.
- Excuses for the acts or omissions of a parent seeking custody
If a parent has a disability or temporary condition, the judge will consider those temporary ailments in awarding custody. Any other excuse for your actions toward your child will always be considered.
Factors that WON’T Matter
Did you know that before 1972 Texas was mainly considered a “Mother” state, but this is no longer the case after the Equal Rights Amendment to the Texas Constitution was signed?
As a result of this, courts will not consider these factors when making their custody decision, and they include:
- Marital Status
- Racial Issues