Levi King is a notorious American criminal whose violent actions in 2005 left an indelible mark on two families and shocked the nation. Born on December 13, 1982, in McDonald County, Missouri, King’s early life was fraught with instability and exposure to violence. This turbulent upbringing played a significant role in shaping his psyche, ultimately leading him down a dark path of crime.
His Early Life
Levi King grew up in an unstable environment marked by neglect and exposure to violence, which eventually contributed to his violent behavior. Born on December 13, 1982, in McDonald County, Missouri, King was one of seven children. His upbringing was far from nurturing. The King household was chaotic and dysfunctional, plagued by extreme poverty and a lack of proper parental guidance. Furthermore, his father, who had a penchant for violence, introduced Levi to alcohol and drugs at a very young age, setting the stage for a tumultuous adolescence.
A Home Of Violence
Levi King grew up in a deeply unsettling environment. The King home was filled with weapons and ammunition, with ceremonial knives and swords adorning the walls. To make matters worse, rampant drug use permeated the household. By the time Levi reached his teens, he had already been exposed to methamphetamine and heroin, substances that further warped his already troubled mind. His father’s influence was particularly harmful, as he not only condoned Levi’s substance abuse but also facilitated it, offering hard liquor and marijuana as part of his initiation into a life of delinquency.
Early Indicators For A Sociopathic Personality
The school offered little relief from the chaos Levi faced at home. He struggled academically and socially, frequently getting into trouble for his antisocial behavior. People knew him for setting fires and killing animals, which were early signs of the deep psychological issues that would later appear in his criminal activities. This combination of an abusive home environment, substance abuse, and early displays of violence clearly showed a young man spiraling out of control.
Trouble With Law
As a teenager, King’s run-ins with the law became more frequent and severe. His criminal record started with petty thefts and minor infractions, but it quickly escalated to more serious crimes. One significant incident involved the burglary of a neighbor’s house. King not only broke into the home but also set it on fire, demonstrating a blatant disregard for the law and the safety of others. This arson incident was particularly telling of his growing propensity for violence and destruction.
King’s actions resulted in a significant legal consequence, as the court sentenced him to 14 years in prison for burglary and arson. However, despite the severity of his crimes, he served less than three years before authorities released him to a halfway house. Unfortunately, his stay there was brief; he disappeared within a week, which further highlighted his inability or unwillingness to follow societal norms and legal boundaries.
His Killing Spree
Levi King’s crime spree in 2005 stands as a particularly heinous chapter in American criminal history, marked by senseless violence and devastating loss. His actions, driven by an insatiable urge to kill, began on September 30 in Pineville, Missouri. King’s first victims were Orlie McCool and his daughter-in-law Dawn McCool. King broke into their rural home, shooting Orlie McCool once and Dawn McCool multiple times before setting their house on fire in an attempt to destroy evidence. The brutal efficiency of these murders set a grim precedent for what was to follow.
Drove From Missouri To Texas
Following the murders in Missouri, King stole the McCool’s vehicle and drove nearly 500 miles south to Pampa, Texas. There, in the early hours of the morning, he targeted the Conrad family’s farmhouse, seemingly chosen at random. King kicked in the door and immediately began shooting, killing Brian Conrad, his pregnant wife Michell, and their 14-year-old son Zach in cold blood. His weapon of choice was a high-powered rifle, and he fired 15 shots in total, ensuring that none of the victims had a chance to survive. The only person spared from death was 10-year-old Robin Doan, who had the presence of mind to play dead after being grazed by a bullet. Robin’s survival was a miracle and provided crucial testimony that would later aid in King’s conviction.
No Motive Just Compulsion
The complete randomness of King’s choice of victims compounded the horror of that night. He had no personal motive and no pre-existing connection to the Conrad family. Instead, a compulsion to kill drove his actions, which he later described with a chilling lack of emotion. Consequently, the brutality of the murders shocked the local community, leaving them to grapple with the sudden and violent loss of a family that many knew and loved.
His Confession To Border Patrol
Authorities apprehended King shortly after the murders when they found him driving the stolen vehicle near the Mexican border. During police interrogations, he calmly confessed to both sets of murders, detailing his actions without any apparent remorse. This behavior revealed a deeply disturbed individual. The trial that followed highlighted King’s troubled past, including a childhood marked by violence and neglect, as potential factors in his descent into criminality.
The Trial Of Levi King
The trial of Levi King was a significant and emotionally charged event, reflecting the severity of his crimes and the profound impact they had on the victims’ families and communities. King faced justice for his brutal murders in two separate states: Missouri, where he killed Orlie McCool and Dawn McCool, and Texas, where he massacred the Conrad family. The proceedings in both states highlighted the complexities of his case, including his troubled background, mental health issues, and the sheer brutality of his actions.
A Plea Deal In Missouri
Levi King’s trial in Missouri was a critical phase in his journey through the criminal justice system, reflecting the gravity of his crimes and the state’s determination to secure a fitting punishment. The trial centered on the brutal murders of Orlie McCool and his daughter-in-law Dawn McCool, which occurred on September 30, 2005. This trial would not only seek justice for the victims but also reveal the dark and disturbed nature of King’s psyche.
How They Prosecuted Him
The prosecution in Missouri was resolute in presenting a case that highlighted the cold-blooded and premeditated nature of King’s actions. They meticulously outlined how King broke into the McCool residence, armed with a stolen rifle, and shot Orlie McCool and Dawn McCool without any provocation or apparent motive.
Overwhelming Evidence
Forensic experts testified about the trajectory of the bullets and the extent of the injuries, vividly painting a gruesome picture of the violence that unfolded that day. Furthermore, the prosecution emphasized that, after committing these murders, King set the house on fire—a brazen act intended to cover up his crimes. This act of arson clearly underscored his attempt to erase any traces of his heinous actions, further illustrating his calculated and remorseless nature.
He Enters A Plea Agreement
In light of the overwhelming evidence against him, King chose to enter a plea agreement rather than face a jury trial. He pled guilty to the charges, thus avoiding the death penalty. This decision was strategic, likely influenced by the strength of the prosecution’s case and the certainty of a guilty verdict if the trial proceeded to a jury. By pleading guilty, King accepted responsibility for his actions, albeit without the possibility of parole, which meant he would spend the rest of his life in prison.
The defense’s role in this phase was largely mitigated by the plea agreement, but they nonetheless worked to highlight King’s troubled past and mental health issues. They presented information about his abusive upbringing, exposure to violence, and early substance abuse, suggesting that these factors contributed significantly to his criminal behavior. However, these mitigating factors did little to sway the outcome given the severity of his crimes and the solid evidence against him.
The Trial In Texas
Levi King’s trial in Texas was the climactic and most emotionally charged chapter of his legal battles, focusing on the brutal murders of Brian Conrad, his pregnant wife Michell, and their 14-year-old son Zach. The only survivor of this massacre, 10-year-old Robin Doan, played a pivotal role in the proceedings. This trial was not only about securing justice for the victims but also about addressing the broader implications of King’s violent rampage.
A Death Penalty Was Sought
The prosecution in Texas sought the death penalty, emphasizing the cold-blooded and senseless nature of the crimes. They meticulously detailed how King broke into the Conrad family’s rural home in Pampa, Texas, in the early hours of September 30, 2005. Armed with a stolen rifle, King shot and killed Brian, Michell, and Zach with ruthless efficiency.
The Evidence Presented
It showed the trajectory of the bullets and the extent of the injuries, painting a vivid and horrifying picture of the attack. The prosecution also presented Robin Doan’s harrowing 911 call and her testimony, which described how she survived by playing dead after being grazed by a bullet. Her account was heart-wrenching and powerful, highlighting the sheer terror and violence of the night.
His Defense Team Tried To Evoke Sympathy
The defense team, facing the daunting task of saving King from the death penalty, focused on his troubled past and mental health issues. They presented a narrative that portrayed King as a deeply disturbed individual, shaped by a childhood filled with neglect, abuse, and exposure to violence. Mental health experts testified that King suffered from bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, arguing that these untreated conditions significantly impaired his ability to control his actions. The defense aimed to evoke sympathy and understanding from the jury, suggesting that King’s crimes were a tragic result of his circumstances rather than sheer malice.
The Prosecution Drove Home The Brutality Of The Crime
Throughout the trial, the emotional weight of the case was palpable. On one hand, the prosecution’s portrayal of the brutal and senseless nature of the murders was powerful. On the other hand, the defense countered this by depicting King as a victim of his environment and mental illness. Consequently, the jury faced the difficult task of balancing these perspectives to determine King’s fate.
Jury Decided Life In Prison
Ultimately, the jury decided against the death penalty, sentencing King to life in prison without the possibility of parole. This decision was influenced by the defense’s compelling arguments about King’s mental health and troubled background, as well as one juror’s steadfast opposition to capital punishment. While the verdict spared King’s life, it ensured that he would never be free again, reflecting a nuanced consideration of justice and mercy.
A Lone Survivor Provides Her Testimony
The trial in Texas was more contentious, focusing on whether King would receive the death penalty for the murders of Brian Conrad, his pregnant wife Michell, and their 14-year-old son Zach. The prosecution presented a compelling case, detailing the horrific nature of the crimes and the calculated manner in which King executed them. The lone survivor, 10-year-old Robin Doan, provided heart-wrenching testimony about the night of the murders, describing how she played dead to survive and later called 911.
His Defense Team Tried To Humanize Him
King’s defense team sought to humanize him, emphasizing his deeply troubled upbringing and long history of mental health issues, including diagnoses of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. They argued that his violent actions were a result of his untreated mental illnesses and the abusive environment in which he was raised. This defense aimed to spare King from the death penalty by portraying him as a product of his circumstances rather than an inherently evil individual.
After a prolonged and emotional trial, the jury ultimately decided against the death penalty, sentencing King to life in prison without the possibility of parole. This decision was not unanimous, with one juror holding out against capital punishment. The outcome was met with mixed reactions; some felt that justice had been served by ensuring King would never be free again, while others believed that the death penalty was the appropriate response given the heinousness of his crimes.
Need Help? Call Us Now!
Do not forget that when you or anyone you know is facing a criminal charge, you have us, the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, by your side to help you build the best defense case for you. We will work and be in your best interest for you and we will obtain the best possible outcome that can benefit you.
Our team is here to explain your trial, guiding you through the criminal justice process with clarity and support every step of the way. If you’re navigating the complexities of criminal charges and the court system seems daunting, reach out.
Therefore, do not hesitate to call us if you find yourself or someone you know that is facing criminal charges unsure about the court system. We will work with you to give you the best type of defense that can help you solve your case. It is vital to have someone explain the result of the charge to you and guide you in the best possible way.
Here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, our professional and knowledgeable criminal law attorneys build a defense case that suits your needs, aiming for the best possible outcome to benefit you.
Also, here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, you are given a free consultation at your convenience. You may choose to have your appointment via Zoom, google meet, email, or an in-person appointment; and we will provide you with as much advice and information as possible so you can have the best possible result in your case.
Call us now at (281) 810-9760.
Other Related Articles
A Chilling Tale of Unsolved Murders
What if You Don’t have a Custody Order and You Move?
People who died without a will: Martin Luther King, Jr.
The Truth Exposed: The Liver King Is In The Spotlight
Married in a different state, divorce in Texas: a roadmap for mobile families
Levi King FAQ
Select a question from the dropdown below to reveal the answer:
Hey there! My name is Olivia Ramirez, I graduated from Sam Houston State University with a bachelor’s of science in Psychology. I can’t help but scour the web for crime news and interesting stories. I write mostly true crime, anything from white collar crimes to the tragic murders across America. I try to mix in local news updates with big hitting scandals.
When I’m not typing away or searching for crime news, you’ll find me in bookstores looking for the new books to add to my backlog. Hanging out with my family or just relaxing with some cozy games to unwind from the day.
