Book an appointment using SetMore

Sharing an attorney in a Texas divorce- Is it possible?

Picture this: two soon-to-be-ex-spouses sitting across from each other at the kitchen table, fervently hashing out the minutiae of their divorce agreement over a cup of lukewarm coffee. You'd think, "Hey, they're making this look easy!" But hold on just a sec, because there's a twist in this tale. Can an attorney, armed with a law degree and a briefcase full of legal know-how, successfully represent both sides of a divorce battle? Buckle up, because we're about to unpack this intriguing legal riddle with all the sass, anecdotes, and insights you've been craving!

Short answer: In a word? Nope. Now, before you start drafting the "But what about..." arguments, let's dive into the juicy details that make this topic way more colorful than a courtroom drama.

Reasons to Keep Reading:

  1. Secrets of Shared Representation: Discover the tempting perks and hidden pitfalls of the "one attorney for both" approach. Ever heard of "too many cooks in the kitchen"? Brace yourself.
  2. Love vs. Law: The Ethics Edition: Get a front-row seat to the moral tussle that lawyers face when dancing between their duty and the fine line of ethical representation. It's like watching a high-stakes chess game, but with more courtrooms and less checkmate.
  3. Mediation: More Than Just a Fancy Word: Meet the unsung hero of divorces - mediation! We're going to demystify this magical process and show you how it's a bit like crafting a peace treaty... without the diplomats.
  4. Divorce Divas: Attorneys in Action: Think attorneys are just legal eagles? Think again! From advisors to negotiators to emotional support superheroes, we're about to reveal how they're the glue holding this whole process together.

So, if you've ever wondered whether an attorney can play referee in the divorce boxing ring, or if you're just curious about the ins and outs of parting ways legally, stick around! We're taking the spotlight off the gavel and shining it right where it belongs - on the real stories, real choices, and real people tangled up in the world of divorce and shared representation. Let's get started!

Diving into the Divorce Dilemma: Can One Attorney Tackle Both Sides of the Ring?

In some instances, spouses will come into our law office to discuss the possibility of our office representing both of them in an upcoming divorce. They have already hatched a plan to settle all of the outstanding issues in their case. All that they need now is an attorney to file the divorce and get the process started. The spouses, in their minds, would rely on that attorney for advice on particular issues and then would finish out the divorce by drawing up all the court orders that a judge would eventually sign their name to.

On the outside, this seems like a nice plan. Lawyers, popular belief holds, typically muddy up the waters and make life more difficult for spouses who are entering into a divorce. What’s more- attorneys will charge you money in order to do so. The divorce would likely take longer as a result and take up more time that could be devoted to their family or other interests. With these circumstances in mind, spouses will come in and see if this dream can be their reality. Unfortunately, I will need to steer them out of this mindset for a number of reasons that we will discuss in today’s blog post.

Conflict in interest when an attorney represents two spouses in a divorce

If you and your spouse find yourself in a situation where you agree on absolutely every issue in your divorce then you are certainly in a unique position. Even the most amicable of divorces have a few issues that need to be sorted out before the case can truly be said to be done. Even in situations where you and your spouse agree on every or almost every issue you are still technically opposing parties in your divorce. Because of this, an attorney cannot adequately represent both you and your spouse’s interests.

With all of this said, there are still options available to people in your position who would like to limit the costs associated with hiring two attorneys in a divorce. First of all, you and your spouse can forego hiring two attorneys and have you or your spouse hire an attorney while the other remains unrepresented. The other is to have neither of you hire an attorney and instead utilize the services of a divorce mediator to mediate any outstanding issues that are relevant in your case.

Mediating your case instead of hiring lawyers

If you and your spouse would like, you can hire a private mediator to intercede into your divorce case and to help you and your spouse craft a settlement on any outstanding issues in your case. This means that issues related to children and property will all be settled in mediation- or will be attempted to be settled in mediation. A mediator will typically be a practicing family law attorney him or herself. The mediator will charge you and your spouse a set amount of money for either a half day or full day mediation.

The job of the mediator is basically to act as a ping pong ball- bouncing in between you and your spouse in order to help you both come together to come up with the specific terms that will create your final orders. If you and your spouse have a general understanding of what your custody/visitation agreement will look like for your children after the divorce a mediator will help you to create something that is specific and able to stand the test of time. Likewise, all property matters will hopefully be settled in mediation. Who remains in the family home (if any), what spouse gets what share of your community estate and any other issues related to property matters will also be sorted out.

Mediations will typically occur at the office of the mediator. You will be in one room while your spouse is in the other. Sometimes spouses will agree to be in the same room and to negotiate across the table from one another. From my experience this can be a tough atmosphere to negotiate in as a glance of the eye or a curl of the lip can aggravate/frustrate the other side.

The mediated settlement agreement

A Mediated Settlement Agreement (MSA) is what you and your spouse will be negotiating for in mediation. The MSA contains all of the agreements that you and your spouse came up with and will act as the guide for whichever spouse ultimately ends up writing your final decree of divorce. He or she will take the MSA and turn its language into an order that a judge will be comfortable signing their name to.

Your mediator will likely walk you through each item in the MSA and will make sure you understand everything contained therein. Usually, your attorney would do this but if you don’t have one the mediator can certainly explain the points of the MSA to you. However, he or she is not able to advise you on whether or not something is a “good idea” for you to enter into with your spouse. The mediator can refer you and your spouse to an attorney who can draft an order based on the language contained in the MSA but will not represent either you or your spouse.

Although mediation costs money it is typically a small sum of money compared to the costs of hiring an attorney and going through an extended family law case. On the other hand, you will not be able to receive any advice or pointers on what you are negotiating and you will not be able to rely upon your attorney’s years of family law experience in negotiating a settlement in your divorce case.

Texas divorce cases are most likely to end in mediation. The vast majority of divorces where the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, PLLC represents one spouse end in mediation. However, if you and your spouse cannot settle in mediation your options become somewhat limited. You have already exercised the most likely route to a settlement and have failed to reach an agreement. If you find yourselves in this position it is likely that at least one of you will now move to hire an attorney to represent your interests.

One family law attorney to represent you or your spouse

The other option that you and your spouse can choose to take on is to have one of you hire an attorney and for the other spouse to be unrepresented. The represented spouse will be responsible for filing the divorce and drafting a final decree of divorce once a settlement is reached. The main advantage this spouse will have is the ability to receive advice about the divorce process from their attorney. If you are represented by an attorney you would know if entering into an agreement on a particular issue were a good idea or not. You would also know how a negotiating strategy could backfire or have unintended consequences for you years down the road.

In many situations, this is an arrangement that works out well for people. Our office has represented clients who are in basic agreement with their spouses on the terms of their divorce. The key thing to understand is that most attorneys are not looking to stir up trouble- on the contrary, these folks are more than happy to work on behalf of their client to resolve whatever issues are in play. It is usually simple, straightforward divorce cases where this method works out for both spouses in the divorce.

Can an Attorney Represent Both Parties? Exploring Shared Representation in Divorce Cases

When couples find themselves on the precipice of divorce, seeking legal guidance can be both a necessity and a daunting prospect. The idea of sharing a single attorney might sound like a cost-effective and streamlined solution. After all, legal battles can be emotionally and financially draining. But can an attorney truly represent both parties in a divorce? In this article, we delve into this intriguing question and explore the multifaceted world of shared representation.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Sharing an Attorney

The concept of sharing an attorney in a divorce case comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. On one hand, it may seem like a convenient path to a swift resolution. Collaborating on a plan and then entrusting a single attorney to formalize the process might sound like a dream scenario. However, there are potential pitfalls that deserve careful consideration. Sharing an attorney might hinder open communication between spouses, potentially compromising their best interests. Moreover, navigating conflicting demands and needs could place the attorney in a complex ethical dilemma.



Cost Efficiency: Sharing an attorney may potentially save on legal fees since you're hiring one instead of two.

Conflict of Interest: As both parties' interests may not align perfectly, the attorney could face a conflict of interest, potentially affecting the quality of representation.

Streamlined Process: With a shared attorney, communication can be quicker and more efficient, especially if both parties are on the same page.

Lack of Independent Advice: Each party might not receive unbiased legal advice tailored to their specific situation, potentially leading to unfair agreements.

Less Emotional Strain: The process can appear less adversarial, reducing emotional stress for the couple.

Potential Communication Issues: Sharing an attorney could lead to miscommunications or misunderstandings, causing unnecessary delays or complications.

Consistent Approach: A single attorney ensures a unified approach, which could lead to smoother negotiations.

Possible Unequal Representation: One party might feel overshadowed, leading to unequal attention or focus on their needs during the process.

Faster Resolution: By collaborating closely, both parties might work more effectively towards an agreement, expediting the divorce process.

Risk of Attorney's Withdrawal: If conflicts arise, the attorney might withdraw from the case, leaving both parties needing to find new representation.

Conflicts of Interest in Shared Representation

Imagine a scenario where both parties agree on most aspects of their divorce, but the question of child custody becomes a point of contention. Sharing an attorney in such a case could lead to conflicts of interest. The attorney might inadvertently prioritize one party's wishes over the other's, jeopardizing fair representation. It's crucial to recognize that even in seemingly amicable divorces, differing perspectives can emerge, necessitating separate legal counsel.

Ethical Considerations

The legal field operates under a code of ethics that places paramount importance on undivided loyalty to clients. When a single attorney represents both parties, questions about maintaining this loyalty inevitably arise. Ethical dilemmas can emerge, requiring attorneys to balance their duty to each spouse while preserving the integrity of their profession. It's essential for spouses to understand that shared representation may compromise the attorney's ability to provide unbiased advice.

Mediation Process and Benefits

As an alternative to hiring two separate attorneys, mediation offers a middle ground that fosters collaboration and resolution. This process involves a neutral third party, a mediator, who facilitates discussions and negotiations between spouses. Mediation can often lead to creative solutions that prioritize the unique needs of each party. It empowers couples to take charge of their divorce while receiving expert guidance.

Different Approaches to Mediation

Mediation comes in various flavors, each with its approach and focus. Facilitative mediation promotes open communication, while evaluative mediation involves the mediator providing expert opinions. Transformative mediation aims to improve communication and understanding between parties. Understanding these different approaches can help couples choose the mediation style that aligns best with their situation and goals.

Mediated Settlement Agreement Detail

A Mediated Settlement Agreement (MSA) serves as the cornerstone of a mediated divorce. This comprehensive document outlines the agreements reached by the spouses during mediation. Covering topics like child custody, property division, and alimony, the MSA becomes the foundation for the final divorce decree. Its specificity and clarity are vital to avoiding future conflicts.

Legal Consequences of Mediation

An MSA isn't just a piece of paper; it holds legal significance. Once signed, it guides the court in crafting the final divorce decree. This emphasizes the importance of thoroughness and accuracy during mediation. Understanding the legal weight of the MSA can motivate spouses to actively engage in the mediation process.

Mediation vs. Litigation

Comparing mediation to traditional litigation reveals distinct advantages. Mediation encourages cooperation, reduces hostility, and allows for tailored solutions. Litigation, on the other hand, can prolong the divorce process, amplify emotional strain, and incur higher costs. Couples must weigh these considerations when deciding between the two paths.

Complex Divorce Cases and Shared Representation

For divorces involving intricate financial assets, complex child custody issues, or unique circumstances, shared representation might not be the most viable option. Complex cases often require specialized expertise to navigate the intricate legal landscape. In these situations, separate legal counsel can provide focused guidance and advocacy.

Role of Attorneys in Divorce

Attorneys play multifaceted roles in divorce cases beyond just legal representation. They provide strategic advice, negotiate on behalf of their clients, and ensure legal documents accurately reflect agreements. The value of an attorney extends beyond the courtroom, contributing to smoother negotiations and a more well-rounded understanding of the legal process.

Legal Resources for Unrepresented Spouse

For individuals who choose not to have legal representation, there are resources available to aid them in navigating the complexities of divorce. Self-help materials, online guides, and legal aid services can provide essential information and support for those navigating the legal system on their own.

Recent Legal Changes

Keeping abreast of recent legal changes is crucial for anyone considering shared representation or divorce mediation. Changes in divorce laws or regulations can impact the feasibility and options available for couples. Staying informed ensures that decisions are made based on the most up-to-date information.

The question of whether an attorney can represent both parties in a divorce doesn't have a simple answer. While shared representation might seem appealing in theory, the intricacies of divorce law, ethical considerations, and potential conflicts of interest often warrant separate legal counsel. Mediation emerges as a balanced alternative that fosters collaboration while maintaining the integrity of the legal process. As couples navigate the complex journey of divorce, understanding their options empowers them to make informed decisions that best suit their unique circumstances.

The Verdict: One Attorney, Two Sides - Can the Puzzle Ever Fit?

Short answer: Nope, the puzzle pieces just don't fit together neatly. But hey, life's rarely a jigsaw puzzle anyway, right?

Before you go thinking that the courtroom is a wild roller coaster with no seatbelts, let's reflect on our journey. We've dug into the "why nots" and the "what ifs" of one attorney tackling both sides of a divorce, revealing that even in the friendliest of breakups, legal tangles can't be ironed out over a cozy chat.

Remember, there's a reason attorneys earn their stripes - they're the champions of negotiation, the guardians of ethics, and the compasses that steer divorces towards resolution. And while a single attorney can't represent both sides, it's comforting to know that the legal world is filled with alternatives like mediation that bring their own brand of magic to the table.

So, if you ever find yourself at the crossroads of "to share or not to share," remember this journey through legal labyrinths. The twists, turns, and tales of shared representation might have left you nodding, chuckling, or even raising an eyebrow or two. In the grand drama of divorce, it's not about one attorney representing both sides - it's about finding the path that fits your story. Until next time, dear reader, may your legal tales be as intriguing as they are enlightening!

Book an appointment with Law Office of Bryan Fagan using SetMore


Adobe Stock 62844981[2]If you want to know more about what you can do, CLICK the button below to get your FREE E-book: 16 Steps to Help You Plan & Prepare for Your Texas Divorce

Divorce Wasting Assets[4] If you want to know more about how to prepare, CLICK the button below to get your FREE E-book: 13 Dirty Tricks to Watch Out For in Your Texas Divorce, and How to Counter Them" Today!

Other Articles you may be interested in:

  1. The Dirty Trick of Using the Same Divorce Lawyer
  2. The Dirty Trick of Fake Emails and Electronic Evidence
  3. Dirty Divorce Trick - Turning into a Temporary “Helicopter” Parent
  4. The Dirty Trick of Embarrassing your Spouse During a Texas Divorce
  5. The Dirty Trick of Damaging, Destroying, or Selling Marital Assets in Texas
  6. The Dirty Trick of Filing for Divorce in Another City
  7. How much does a child custody case cost?
  8. How Much is a Relocation Case Going to Cost Me?
  9. How Much Does a Custody Lawyer Cost in Texas?
  10. What will it cost me if I delay getting my estate planning done… or just don’t do it all?
  11. The average cost associated with hiring a junior attorney with the Law Office of Bryan Fagan to represent you in a Child Protective Services case
  12. The average cost of a divorce with a Senior Attorney at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan
  13. The costs of hiring a junior attorney for your divorce case with the Law Office of Bryan Fagan
  14. How much does a probate lawyer cost in Texas?
  15. How much should it cost to update a will?

Frequently Asked Questions: Can an Attorney Represent Both Parties?

Fill Out To Watch Now!

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.