...

Chase, Escape, And Manhunt: Risky Behavior Leads To Being Wanted

High Speed Chase

Gustavo Enriquez is currently a fugitive, wanted by U.S. Marshals since October, following his involvement in a high-speed police chase in St. Francis, Wisconsin. Identifiable by numerous tattoos, including a prominent five-point crown that extends from his abdomen up towards his neck, Enriquez is described as 6’2″ tall, weighing 215 pounds. He has strong connections to Milwaukee’s south side, where he is believed to be currently located. Authorities are urging anyone with information about his whereabouts to contact the U.S. Marshals tip line, ensuring anonymity for informants.

The Event That Started It Off

The high-speed chase involving Gustavo Enriquez unfolded as a dramatic sequence of events that cast a spotlight on the dangers and unpredictability of such incidents. It began in late August 2023, when St. Francis police noticed Enriquez making an illegal U-turn, prompting them to initiate a routine traffic stop. Initially, it appeared that Enriquez would comply as he halted his red Pontiac. However, the situation escalated quickly when he chose to flee, igniting a high-speed pursuit that would ultimately mark him as a significant figure in Wisconsin’s law enforcement annals.

As Enriquez pushed his vehicle to its limits, darting through the streets in a desperate attempt to evade capture, the chase epitomized the inherent risks associated with high-speed pursuits. Such incidents not only endanger the lives of the fleeing individual and law enforcement officers but also pose a significant threat to unsuspecting bystanders and the broader community.

This incident is emblematic of the broader issues surrounding high-speed police chases, including the complex balance between apprehending suspects and ensuring public safety. The decision to engage in or discontinue a chase involves rapid assessments of risk, potential harm to the community, and the necessity of immediate capture. Enriquez’s case serves as a stark reminder of the unpredictable nature of such encounters and the lasting consequences they can have on all involved parties, from the individual attempting to flee to the broader community that inadvertently becomes a part of the unfolding drama.

Crash And Hospital

The culmination of the high-speed chase involving Gustavo Enriquez was both dramatic and harrowing, ending in a crash that would have significant implications for him and the law enforcement officers involved. As Enriquez’s red Pontiac, pushed to its limits during the pursuit, ultimately failed to navigate the high speeds and intense pressure, it crashed on S. Pennsylvania Avenue. This moment marked a critical juncture, not only in the chase itself but also in Enriquez’s flight from the law.

The aftermath of the crash was a scene of chaos and urgency, as first responders quickly assessed the situation. Enriquez, having suffered significant injuries in the crash, including a damaged right hip and a broken right leg, was in immediate need of medical attention. The severity of his injuries necessitated prompt hospitalization, shifting the scenario from one of law enforcement pursuit to medical emergency.

Escape From the Hospital

The specific details of Gustavo Enriquez’s escape from the hospital, following the injuries he sustained during the high-speed chase, are not clearly outlined in the available information. However, such escapes typically involve a combination of factors, including a momentary lapse in security, the ingenuity of the individual, and the inherent challenges of maintaining strict surveillance in a busy medical facility focused on patient care.

In scenarios akin to Enriquez’s, an individual might exploit the bustling nature of hospital environments, where staff are primarily focused on medical duties and the well-being of numerous patients. Hospitals are not designed as detention centers; their open and accessible layout, intended to accommodate medical staff, patients, and visitors, can inadvertently provide opportunities for determined individuals to slip away unnoticed.

Enriquez, despite his injuries, would have needed to assess his surroundings carefully, looking for a moment when attention was diverted away from him. This could have been during a shift change, when there was a significant influx of visitors, or perhaps during an emergency situation elsewhere in the hospital that required immediate and focused attention from the medical staff and any on-site security personnel.

The success of such an escape would also depend on Enriquez’s physical condition at the time, particularly given the injuries described. His ability to move, despite a broken leg and hip injuries, suggests a high level of determination and possibly a tolerance for pain, driven by a strong desire to avoid re-arrest and the impending legal consequences.

While the exact method of Enriquez’s escape remains unspecified, it is clear that such an act would not only require a significant amount of planning and courage but also a confluence of circumstances that provided him with the necessary window of opportunity to elude the grasp of law enforcement once again.

Second attempt at catching him

Following his escape from the hospital, law enforcement remained on high alert, knowing that Enriquez was still within the community and potentially a danger to public safety. The breakthrough seemed imminent when, on the day a warrant was issued for his failure to appear in court, St. Francis police believed they had spotted him again. This sighting set off a rapid chain of events, as officers initiated another high-speed pursuit in an attempt to finally capture Enriquez.

In this second encounter, the police employed stop sticks in an effort to safely bring the vehicle to a halt and prevent another dangerous chase. The use of stop sticks, a tactic designed to deflate a vehicle’s tires and gradually reduce its speed, indicates the police’s intent to avoid the high-risk scenarios that characterized their previous encounter with Enriquez. However, the situation quickly escalated as a passenger in the vehicle reportedly attacked the police, creating a chaotic and dangerous diversion.

As the focus shifted to dealing with the immediate threat posed by the attacking passenger, a man believed to be Enriquez seized the moment to flee the scene. Despite the physical limitations suggested by his distinct limp on the right side, he managed to evade capture once again. This moment underscored the challenges law enforcement faces in such high-pressure situations, where split-second decisions can determine the outcome of an encounter with a fugitive.

The second missed opportunity to apprehend Enriquez not only highlighted the difficulties in predicting and managing the actions of individuals desperate to avoid capture but also served as a sobering reminder of the unpredictable nature of police work, where despite the best efforts and strategies, fugitives can still find ways to slip through the cracks, leaving law enforcement to regroup and continue their pursuit.

What Are The Penalties If He Is Caught?

In Wisconsin, the specific penalties Gustavo Enriquez could face, given his alleged involvement in a high-speed chase, subsequent crash, and evasion of law enforcement, would be determined by a variety of factors, including the nature of the charges, his criminal history, and the circumstances surrounding each offense. The legal framework in Wisconsin categorizes offenses into misdemeanors and felonies, with the latter carrying more severe penalties.

Reckless Endangerment

Starting with the high-speed chase, if Enriquez is charged with fleeing or eluding an officer, under Wisconsin Statutes Section 346.04(3), this offense can be classified as a Class I felony if no bodily harm occurred but the action recklessly endangered safety. This classification could result in a fine of up to $10,000, imprisonment of up to 3.5 years, or both. If the chase resulted in bodily harm, the charge could escalate to a Class H felony, carrying a potential penalty of up to $10,000 in fines and/or up to 6 years in prison.

Evading Police

Regarding his escape from the hospital, if considered an escape from custody under Wisconsin Statutes Section 946.42, the penalty would depend on Enriquez’s custody status at the time of the escape. If he was under arrest or detained for a felony charge, the escape could itself be charged as a Class H felony, leading to similar penalties as above.

Failing To Appear

For failing to appear in court, under Wisconsin Statutes Section 946.49, if he was released on bail for a felony and failed to appear, this could result in a charge carrying a penalty of up to $10,000 in fines and/or imprisonment for up to 9 months, or, if the court appearance was for a felony, the term of imprisonment could match the maximum term of the felony for which he was initially charged.

Other Charges That Can Be Applied

Additionally, any charges related to resisting or obstructing an officer, endangering public safety, or causing damage during the chase or escape could add further penalties, including additional fines and incarceration time, compounding the severity of Enriquez’s legal situation. Each charge would be evaluated individually, and penalties could be served consecutively or concurrently, depending on the court’s ruling.

Need Help? Call Us Now!

Do not forget that when you or anyone you know is facing a criminal charge, you have us, the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, by your side to help you build the best defense case for you. We will work and be in your best interest for you and we will obtain the best possible outcome that can benefit you. We can explain everything you need to know about your trial and how to defend your case best.

Our team is here to explain your trial, guiding you through the criminal justice process with clarity and support every step of the way. If you’re navigating the complexities of criminal charges and the court system seems daunting, reach out.

Therefore, do not hesitate to call us if you find yourself or someone you know that is facing criminal charges unsure about the court system. We will work with you to give you the best type of defense that can help you solve your case. It is vital to have someone explain the result of the charge to you and guide you in the best possible way.

Here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, we have professional and knowledgeable criminal law attorneys who are experienced in building a defense case for you that suits your needs for the best possible outcome that can benefit you.  

Also, here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, you are given a free consultation at your convenience. You may choose to have your appointment via Zoom, google meet, email, or an in-person appointment; and we will provide you with as much advice and information as possible so you can have the best possible result in your case. 

Call us now at (281) 810-9760.

Book an appointment with Law Office of Bryan Fagan using SetMore

Should you go to your CPS hearing even if you have warrants out for your arrest?

Evading Arrest in the State of Texas

Murder Kevin Quickly Escape America And Flees To Kenya

Shilo Wells’ Arrest and Its Ripple Effect on Porter Community

Free Man To Outlawed Fugitive: Devin Rossman Another Capitol Rioter

High Stakes: Understanding the Dangers of Police Pursuits

Married in a different state, divorce in Texas: a roadmap for mobile families

FAQs about Gustavo Enriquez

Select a question from the dropdown below to reveal the answer:

Share this article

Category

Categories

Contact Law Office of Bryan Fagan, PLLC Today!

At the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, PLLC, the firm wants to get to know your case before they commit to work with you. They offer all potential clients a no-obligation, free consultation where you can discuss your case under the client-attorney privilege. This means that everything you say will be kept private and the firm will respectfully advise you at no charge. You can learn more about Texas divorce law and get a good idea of how you want to proceed with your case.

Plan Your Visit

Office Hours

Mon-Fri: 8 AM – 6 PM Saturday: By Appointment Only

"(Required)" indicates required fields