Maine’s Yellow Flag Law: Balancing Mental Health and Gun Rights

Maine’s “yellow flag” law was implemented with the aim of preventing mass shootings and other violent incidents by addressing concerns related to mental health and firearm possession. The law allows law enforcement to detain individuals who are suspected of being mentally ill and posing a threat to themselves or others. Unlike red flag laws, the “yellow flag” law necessitates the involvement of a medical professional who evaluates the individual to determine whether they pose a threat. Only after this evaluation, and if the person is found to be a threat, can law enforcement petition a judge to order the seizure of the person’s firearms.

The law came under scrutiny following a tragic mass shooting incident in Maine. Questions were raised about whether the law was effectively implemented in this case. For instance, the suspected shooter had previously been committed to a mental health facility after exhibiting erratic behavior and making threats. This raised questions about whether the “yellow flag” law should have been triggered, which would have led to the individual being separated from his weapons.

The “yellow flag” law is distinct because it requires a formal evaluation by a medical practitioner before any legal actions, such as the seizure of firearms, can be taken. This is a crucial aspect that differentiates it from red flag laws, as it adds an additional layer of assessment to ensure that the individual’s mental health status is accurately evaluated before any legal actions are pursued.

The law is part of Maine’s efforts to balance individual rights with public safety concerns, ensuring that individuals who are deemed a threat due to mental health issues are temporarily separated from firearms, reducing the risk of violent incidents.

Prevention Of Harm

“Yellow flag” laws are proactive, allowing for intervention before a violent act occurs. By temporarily removing firearms from individuals deemed a threat due to mental health concerns, these laws aim to prevent potential harm to the individual and others.

However, the effectiveness in preventing harm depends on the timely and accurate identification of individuals posing a risk, as we

Yellow flag” laws incorporate legal processes and safeguards to ensure that individuals’ rights are protected. For instance, a judge’s involvement is required to endorse actions such as the temporary seizure of firearms.

These legal safeguards aim to balance preventive actions with respect for individuals’ rights and due process.

Challenges And Limitations

The effectiveness of “yellow flag” laws can be impacted by various challenges such as the availability and accessibility of mental health resources, and the clarity and consistency of legal processes.

The criteria for assessing and determining threats, as well as the processes for implementing the law’s provisions, can influence how effectively the law functions in practice.

Scrutiny And Evaluation

Continuous scrutiny, evaluation, and refinement of “yellow flag” laws based on practical experiences and outcomes are crucial. This allows for the identification of areas for improvement and the enhancement of the law’s effectiveness.

Learning from specific cases and broader trends can provide insights into how the law can be more effectively applied and implemented.
Case-Specific Effectiveness

Assessing the law’s effectiveness in specific cases allows for a nuanced understanding of its impact. It involves examining whether the law was appropriately applied and whether it effectively addressed the risks and challenges in each case.

Case-specific assessments can provide valuable insights into the practical application of the law and its impact on individuals and communities.

In conclusion, the effectiveness of “yellow flag” laws is multifaceted, influenced by various factors including legal provisions, medical involvement, implementation processes, and broader societal and systemic factors. Continuous evaluation, learning, and refinement are essential to enhance the law’s effectiveness in preventing harm while respecting individuals’ rights.

How Does Maine Yellow Law Compare To Red Law?

Initiation Process

Yellow Flag Law (Maine): The process is initiated by law enforcement officers when they believe that a person, due to mental illness, is a risk to themselves or others. This approach is more centralized and relies on the discretion and judgment of law enforcement authorities.

Red Flag Law: These laws allow a broader range of petitioners, including family members, intimate partners, and law enforcement officers, to request a court order to temporarily remove firearms from someone deemed a risk.

Medical Evaluation

Yellow Flag Law (Maine): A distinctive feature is the mandatory involvement of medical professionals who evaluate the individual’s mental health. This ensures that professional medical assessments guide the decision-making process.

Red Flag Law: These laws don’t necessarily require a medical evaluation. Decisions are often made based on evidence and testimonies presented to the court, which might not always include a comprehensive medical assessment.

Legal Process

Yellow Flag Law (Maine): After a medical evaluation, law enforcement can petition a judge to temporarily remove firearms from the individual deemed a risk. This process ensures judicial oversight and legal scrutiny.

Red Flag Law: These laws allow for direct petitioning to the court, and a judge makes the decision based on the presented evidence, ensuring that there is a legal process and judicial involvement.

Duration And Review

Yellow Flag Law (Maine): The laws are temporary and subject to review and legal processes to determine the continuation or cessation of the firearm restrictions.

Red Flag Law: These orders are also temporary and subject to expiration and review, allowing for a reassessment of the individual’s risk status.


Yellow Flag Law (Maine): The focus is primarily on mental health concerns, ensuring that individuals with mental health challenges that pose a risk are the primary focus.

Red Flag Law: These laws have a broader focus, encompassing various risks such as threats, domestic violence, and other concerning behaviors beyond mental health.

Discretion And Decision-Making

Yellow Flag Law (Maine): The involvement of medical professionals adds a layer of clinical discretion and expertise, ensuring that decisions are medically informed.

Red Flag Law: The decision-making is more legally focused, relying on judicial discretion and the evaluation of presented evidence and testimonies.

In conclusion, Maine’s “yellow flag” laws emphasize medical evaluations and are more focused on mental health considerations, while “red flag” laws have a broader scope and allow for a wider range of petitioners and considerations in the decision-making process. Both sets of laws have legal processes and judicial oversight to ensure a balanced and legally scrutinized approach.

How Did Maine Yellow Law Fail To Identify Robert Card?

Medical Evaluation and Legal Process

The “yellow flag” law requires a medical practitioner to evaluate the person and find them to be a threat before the police can petition a judge to order the person’s firearms to be seized.

In Robert Card’s case, it is unclear whether such a medical evaluation was conducted or whether the law was invoked to assess his potential risk.

Implementation Challenges

The law faced challenges such as difficulties in finding a doctor to conduct evaluations quickly, and hospitals had concerns about the safety of their personnel conducting the evaluations.

It is not specified whether such challenges played a role in the failure to identify Robert Card as a threat.

Limited Use and Family Involvement

Critics have mentioned that the law is unlikely to be used by families who do not want to traumatize a loved one by having them taken into custody.

It is not clear whether family concerns or reluctance played a role in this case.

Background Check System and Loopholes

There are errors and loopholes in the system, such as the lack of required background checks at unlicensed or private sellers in many states.

It is not specified whether such loopholes contributed to Robert Card’s ability to possess firearms.

Formal Commitment and Reporting

Not everyone who stays at a mental health facility is considered formally committed. Formal commitment is a court process, and a judge typically must approve it.

It is not clear whether Robert Card was formally committed or whether such information was accurately reported and acted upon.

Overall Systemic And Legal Weaknesses

Critics argue that the overall approach to gun violence in the state is weak, and the “yellow flag” law is part of this broader context of insufficient measures.

The systemic weaknesses might have contributed to the failure to identify and act upon the risks posed by Robert Card.

The failure to identify Robert Card as a threat under Maine’s “yellow flag” law seems to be influenced by various factors, including implementation challenges, systemic weaknesses, and potential gaps in the legal and reporting processes. The specifics of whether and how the law was applied or considered in Robert Card’s case are not clearly detailed in the available information.

What Other States Have Yellow Flag Laws?

Maine appears to be unique in having a “yellow flag” law. This law is distinct from the “red flag” laws that are present in various forms in several other states. The “yellow flag” law in Maine focuses specifically on individuals who are undergoing a mental health crisis, requiring both a medical evaluation and a legal process involving a judge to temporarily remove firearms from the individual deemed a risk.

The law is designed to be a preventive measure, allowing for intervention when there is a belief that a person’s mental health status poses a significant risk of harm to themselves or others. However, it seems that this approach, with its specific focus on mental health and the involvement of medical professionals in the evaluation process, is unique to Maine and not labeled as a “yellow flag” law in other states.

Other states have “red flag” laws, which allow family members, law enforcement, or other parties to petition a court to temporarily remove firearms from someone deemed to be a risk to themselves or others, but these laws do not necessarily require a medical evaluation as part of the process.

Need Help? Call Us Now!

Do not forget that when you or anyone you know is facing a criminal charge, you have us, the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, by your side to help you build the best defense case for you. We will work and be in your best interest for you and we will obtain the best possible outcome that can benefit you. We can explain everything you need to know about your trial and how to defend your case best. We can help you step by step through the criminal process. 

Therefore, do not hesitate to call us if you find yourself or someone you know that is facing criminal charges unsure about the court system. We will work with you to give you the best type of defense that can help you solve your case. It is vital to have someone explain the result of the charge to you and guide you in the best possible way.

Here at the law Office of Bryan Fagan, we have professional and knowledgeable criminal law attorneys who are experienced in building a defense case for you that suits your needs for the best possible outcome that can benefit you.  

Also, here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, you are given a free consultation at your convenience. You may choose to have your appointment via Zoom, google meet, email, or an in-person appointment; and we will provide you with as much advice and information as possible so you can have the best possible result in your case. 

Call us now at (281) 810-9760.

Book an appointment with Law Office of Bryan Fagan using SetMore

Unraveling the Mystery: The Lewiston Mass Shooting

What are The Red Flags in a Marriage?

Texas’ Firearms Frontier: Understanding the Latest Gun Laws

Why a gun trust is important in Texas

The Synagogue Shooter: Exploring the Tragedy

Samantha Woll: Understanding Homicide Laws in Michigan

The Murder of Judge Andrew F. Wilkinson

Unpacking the Texas State Fair Shooting Case

The Texas Penalties for Tampering with Weapon Detectors

In the Shadow of the Mafia: The Hunt for Matteo Messina Denaro

Maine’s Yellow Flag Law FAQ

Maine’s Yellow Flag Law FAQ

Select a question from the dropdown below to reveal the answer:

Categories: Uncategorized

Share this article



Related Articles

Legal Remedies: How Texas Addresses Cyber Bullying and Ensures Online Safety

The Evolution of Legislation: Tracing the Development of Texas Cyber Bullying Laws

Navigating the Divorce Spectrum: Understanding Contested vs Uncontested Divorce

Dirty Divorce Tricks Series: Using Children as Weapons

The Road to Clarity Parental Rights and Child Custody in Texas

Las Vegas Under Fire: Survival Of Campus Shooting

Contact Law Office of Bryan Fagan, PLLC Today!

At the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, PLLC, the firm wants to get to know your case before they commit to work with you. They offer all potential clients a no-obligation, free consultation where you can discuss your case under the client-attorney privilege. This means that everything you say will be kept private and the firm will respectfully advise you at no charge. You can learn more about Texas divorce law and get a good idea of how you want to proceed with your case.

Office Hours

Mon-Fri: 8 AM – 6 PM Saturday: By Appointment Only

"(Required)" indicates required fields