In February 2023, the Harris County Family Court system introduced meaningful changes that reshaped how families and legal professionals navigated domestic matters. The district family courts updated their dockets, expanded the use of hybrid hearings, and emphasized quicker resolutions in divorce, custody, and support cases. These adjustments weren’t just procedural—they directly impacted how families experienced the legal process. While each courtroom operated with its own rhythm, the overall message was clear: reduce delays, streamline cases, and prioritize timely outcomes for families in transition.
Who Runs the Harris County Family Courts?
Harris County has ten family district courts. Each one handles a wide range of family law cases. Judges serve four-year terms and run on partisan ballots. As of February 2023, these were the presiding judges:
- 245th District Court – Judge Tristan Longino
- 246th District Court – Judge Angela Graves-Harrington
- 247th District Court – Judge Janice Berg
- 257th District Court – Judge Sandra Peake
- 308th District Court – Judge Gloria López
- 309th District Court – Judge Linda Dunson
- 310th District Court – Judge Sonya Heath
- 311th District Court – Judge Germaine Tanner
- 312th District Court – Judge Clinton “Chip” Wells
- 507th District Court – Judge Julia Maldonado
Each judge brings a different management style, courtroom demeanor, and approach to contested issues. Some prefer longer hearings, others push mediation or encourage early settlements.
February 2023: What Changed in Court Procedures?
Attorneys reported slight shifts in docket procedures across several courts. Judges updated policies to increase efficiency and limit delay, especially in high-volume courts like the 308th and 312th. Here’s what stood out in February:
Shorter Dockets on Monday Mornings
Several courts reduced the number of motions set for Monday mornings. In the past, these dockets could stretch late into the afternoon. Judges now stagger time slots and limit hearings to reduce overlap and wait time. Lawyers appreciated this change because it cut down on hours spent in the hallway waiting for cases to be called.
More Zoom Hearings
Although in-person hearings returned after pandemic restrictions eased, some judges kept remote appearances for certain matters. Temporary orders, status conferences, and even enforcement actions took place on Zoom when both sides agreed. Courts like the 246th and 507th used hybrid models, allowing attorneys to attend in person or remotely based on the case type.
Mandatory Mediation Before Final Trials
Judges in courts such as the 257th and 310th emphasized the need for mediation before parties could get a final trial setting. Some made mediation a requirement on all contested cases, while others only enforced it in custody or property disputes. Courts focused on clearing the backlog from previous years, and mediation helped avoid unnecessary trials.
How Judges Managed Their Dockets
Each judge has discretion over how they run their courtroom. February gave attorneys insight into how different courts handled busy dockets.
308th District Court
Judge Gloria López focused on moving cases forward. She pushed for early mediation and asked attorneys to avoid delays. Uncontested dockets moved quickly. She encouraged litigants to settle minor disputes without requesting hearings.
245th District Court
Judge Longino gave litigants clear deadlines. He expected discovery to move on schedule and discouraged late filings. He also offered short hearings for issues like discovery disputes or interim possession schedules.
311th District Court
Judge Germaine Tanner continued her reputation for being organized and approachable. Attorneys noted that she listened carefully but kept control of the courtroom. She made rulings promptly and avoided drawn-out arguments.
Trends in Custody and Support Cases
In February, child-related matters remained some of the most contested issues across Harris County family courts. Several trends stood out.
Focus on Child Stability
Judges gave strong weight to school stability and consistent routines when ruling on temporary custody. Parents who showed steady involvement in school events and daily care often received favorable terms. Judges encouraged co-parenting where possible but made clear they would not tolerate interference or manipulation.
Child Support Enforcement
Courts took child support enforcement seriously. Judges heard more contempt actions in February than in the previous month. Parents who failed to pay often faced wage withholding, driver’s license suspension, or short-term jail time. Judges also offered payment plans if the non-custodial parent showed effort.
Virtual Visits and Phone Contact
Some judges included language in orders to support video calls and digital contact between visits. In high-conflict cases, judges warned both parents against monitoring or blocking these calls. Courts favored flexibility but required parents to respect the terms.
Property Division and Trial Readiness
In divorce cases with property disputes, judges pushed parties to complete inventories and exchange documents early. Several courts increased scrutiny on discovery compliance. Lawyers who missed deadlines or failed to communicate risked sanctions or having motions struck.
Courts like the 312th and 309th made it clear they would not schedule trials unless both sides had submitted complete paperwork. They focused on getting the docket under control and set realistic timelines.
What Lawyers Noticed in Court Culture
February also gave lawyers a chance to observe how the judges interacted with litigants. Some differences in courtroom culture became more noticeable.
Consistent Time Management
Courts with firm start times and clear calendars gained praise from local attorneys. Judges who kept their word on timing earned respect. It allowed lawyers to schedule other hearings or return to the office without losing the full day in court.
Patience for Self-Represented Litigants
Judges showed a willingness to guide people who did not have attorneys. While they held everyone to the rules, they allowed extra time for self-represented parties to speak or clarify their claims. This approach helped prevent unnecessary continuances and built public trust in the court system.
No Room for Drama
Judges showed little patience for games or outbursts. They warned litigants to avoid emotional displays, interruptions, or side comments. Courts focused on facts, legal standards, and protecting children’s interests.
What This Means for Families and Lawyers
The updates in February made one thing clear—judges want faster progress, fewer delays, and more resolution outside trial. Families who cooperated and followed court guidelines had smoother outcomes. Those who fought every issue faced longer timelines and higher stress.
Lawyers who stayed organized, followed court rules, and showed up prepared often had better results for their clients. Courts rewarded efficiency and discouraged gamesmanship.
Share This Harris County Family Court Resource
In February 2023, the Harris County Family Court system demonstrated a renewed commitment to structure, time efficiency, and early resolution. Judges streamlined their dockets, leveraged remote hearings strategically, and strongly encouraged mediation to resolve disputes outside the courtroom. In custody cases, the focus remained on preserving stability for children, while property disputes required both parties to arrive prepared and informed.
Although each court maintained its own rhythm, a common theme united them all—resolve cases fairly and without unnecessary delay. Families and attorneys who adapted to this focused, fast-paced environment were more likely to achieve clear and effective outcomes.
Ebook
If you want to know more about what you can do, CLICK the button below to get your FREE E-book: “16 Steps to Help You Plan & Prepare for Your Texas Divorce”
If you want to know more about how to prepare, CLICK the button below to get your FREE E-book: “13 Dirty Tricks to Watch Out For in Your Texas Divorce, and How to Counter Them” Today!”
Other Articles you may be interested in:
- How to File a Protective Order in Harris County, Texas
- Filing for Custody in the Correct Texas County: A Step-by-Step Guide
- Divorce in Texas: What County Do You Need to File In?
- Harris County, Texas Family Law Court – 245TH Judicial District Local Rules
- Harris County, Texas Family Law Court – 257TH Judicial District Local Rules
- Harris County, Texas Family Law Court – 247TH Judicial District Local Rules
- Harris County, Texas Family Law Court – 246TH Judicial District Local Rules
- Texas Parental Visitation – Texas Standard Possession Orders in Harris and Montgomery County, Texas – Part 1
- Preparing for Your Child Custody Hearing Texas
- Family court cases and their impact on your child’s school
Frequently Asked Questions about Divorce Proceedings in Texas
Divorce cases in Harris County are handled by the Family District Courts.
Yes, most family court records in Texas are public, unless they have been sealed by the court.
Divorce cases in Texas are typically handled by the county’s District Court.
You can find out your court date in Texas by visiting the county court’s website or by calling the county clerk’s office.
A divorce in Houston, Texas, typically takes around 60 days at a minimum but can take longer depending on the complexity of the case.
The cost of a divorce in Harris County can vary greatly depending on factors like attorney fees, but court filing fees alone can range from $200 to $300.
Judges in Texas look at factors such as the child’s preferences, the mental and physical health of parents, and the stability of each parent’s home environment when determining child custody.
Texas is a one-party consent state, which means it is generally legal to record a conversation as long as at least one party consents to the recording. Therefore, you can record a conversation with your spouse in Texas if you are part of the conversation.
In Texas, judges determine child custody based on the best interests of the child. This includes factors such as the child’s emotional and physical needs, the capability of the parents to care for the child, the stability of the home, and the child’s wishes, among others.