...

Unraveling the Truth: A YouTube Prank Gone Wrong

Tanner Cook is a well-known YouTuber who has garnered a significant following on his channel. He is recognized for his engaging content, which predominantly consists of vlogs, challenges, and pranks. As of the information provided, Tanner Cook’s YouTube channel, named “Classified Goons,” boasts over 800,000 subscribers, and he consistently uploads videos that attract hundreds of thousands of views.

Tanner has managed to achieve a level of success that enables him to connect with his audience and foster a community of devoted supporters. His content is primarily tailored for a younger demographic, and he has successfully captivated them with his lively and entertaining approach. Additionally, Tanner is also a professional comedian.

However, Tanner Cook recently made headlines after being shot while filming a prank video at the Dulles Town Center Mall in Virginia on April 2, 2023. He is renowned for his prank videos, where he often plays practical jokes on unsuspecting individuals. His YouTube channel, “Classified Goons,” has nearly 40,000 subscribers. Following the shooting incident, members of Cook’s family expressed their concerns about the potential dangers of his prank videos and urged him to reconsider the nature of his content.

Born and raised in the United States, Tanner was reportedly born in 2002, making him 23 years old as of 2023. He is a Christian by faith. From an early age, Tanner displayed a keen interest in comedy. He pursued his basic education at a local private school and later enrolled in a reputed university for higher studies. After completing his education, Tanner shifted his focus to his professional comedy career.

Tanner’s parents, Mr. Jeramy Cook and Mrs. Cook, have played pivotal roles in his life. Despite the traumatic experience, Tanner has expressed that the incident will not deter him from producing videos. His YouTube channel, “Classified Goons,” has a subscriber count exceeding 50,000 and features a mix of prank videos, vlogs, and other diverse content.

Who Is Alan Colie?

Alan Colie is a 31-year-old individual who gained significant attention following an incident involving a YouTube prankster named Tanner Cook.

Alan Colie hails from Leesburg, Virginia. He graduated from Loudoun County High School. Professionally, he worked as a courier delivery driver. His Facebook page revealed that he is originally from Fairfax, Virginia. Notably, Colie’s Facebook page also showcased a photo of the National Rifle Association logo and the “Don’t Tread on Me Flag,” indicating a possible affiliation or support for these symbols. It’s worth noting that in 2012, Colie was charged in Loudoun County with assault and battery on a family member, but this charge was dismissed in 2014.

The incident between Alan Colie and Tanner Cook garnered significant media attention. Many debated the ethics of prank videos, especially when they can be perceived as threatening. While some argued that Tanner’s prank might have been in poor taste, they believed it did not warrant a violent response. On the other hand, there were those who felt that pranks, especially those mimicking criminal activities, can have unintended consequences.

As of April 4, 2023, Alan Colie was being held at the Loudoun County Adult Detention Center. His first court appearance was scheduled for April 5, 2023, for a bond hearing, with a preliminary hearing set for May 3, 2023. It was unclear if he had hired an attorney, but online records indicated that he had been appointed a public defender.

In conclusion, Alan Colie’s involvement in the shooting of Tanner Cook brought him into the limelight. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the potential dangers of public pranks and the unpredictable reactions they can elicit from unsuspecting individuals. As the legal proceedings continue, many will be watching closely to see the outcome and any potential implications for both pranksters and the general public.

The Incident

Tanner Cook, a 21-year-old YouTuber, is known for his prank videos on his channel “Classified Goons.” With a significant following, Tanner’s videos often involve playing practical jokes on strangers, sometimes pushing the boundaries of what some might consider acceptable. On the other hand, Alan Colie, a 31-year-old man, was not a public figure until the incident with Tanner.

On April 2, 2023, Tanner Cook was filming a prank video at the Dulles Town Center Mall in Virginia. The specific prank for that day involved Tanner pretending to rob a bank. This act was meant to be a humorous interaction for his YouTube channel, but it took a tragic turn.

Alan Colie, who was at the mall during the filming of the prank, became the target of Tanner’s joke. However, instead of finding the prank amusing or simply ignoring it, Alan felt threatened. In a reaction that shocked many, Alan pulled out a gun and shot Tanner Cook. Tanner sustained gunshot wounds to his stomach and liver.

The shooting led to immediate panic at the mall, with many fearing an active shooter situation. The police were quick to respond, and Alan Colie was arrested shortly after the incident. He was charged with malicious wounding and the use of a firearm in the commission of a felony.

Tanner Cook was rushed to the hospital, where he was admitted to the intensive care unit. The bullet had reportedly punctured his lung and liver, causing serious injuries. As of the latest reports, Tanner was in the ICU but was expected to recover.

The incident sparked a massive debate online and in the media. Many questioned the ethics of prank videos, especially those that could be perceived as threatening or harmful. Some argued that while Tanner’s prank might have been in poor taste, it did not warrant a violent response. Others felt that pranks, especially those that mimic criminal activities, can have unintended consequences, as was evident in this case.

Tanner’s family was understandably distraught. They expressed concerns about the dangers of his prank videos and urged him to reconsider the nature of his content

Alan Colie was taken into custody and faced legal proceedings for his actions. The case was closely followed by the media, given the public interest in both the shooter and the victim. In a surprising turn of events, Alan Colie was acquitted of the charge of aggravated malicious wounding. The defense likely argued that Alan felt genuinely threatened by Tanner’s prank and reacted out of fear for his life.

The incident between Alan Colie and Tanner Cook serves as a stark reminder of the potential dangers of public pranks, especially those that can be misconstrued as real threats. While content creators often push boundaries to gain views and followers, it’s crucial to consider the potential consequences and the safety of all involved. On the other hand, the incident also raises questions about how individuals react to perceived threats and the fine line between self-defense and excessive force.

Following his arrest, Alan Colie faced a series of serious charges. The first and most severe was Aggravated Malicious Wounding. In Virginia, this is a class 2 felony. The charge implies that the accused intentionally caused severe injury to another person with the intent to maim, disfigure, or kill. If convicted, this charge alone could result in a prison sentence ranging from 20 years to life.

The second charge was the Use of a Firearm in the Commission of a Felony. This charge is also treated gravely in Virginia. It pertains to individuals who, while committing a felony, use a firearm. The presence and use of a firearm during the commission of a crime can significantly enhance the penalties faced by the accused.

Lastly, Colie was charged with Discharging a Firearm Within a Building. This is a class C misdemeanor in Virginia, indicating that the act of firing a weapon inside a structure, especially a public one like a mall, is a punishable offense. Such an act can endanger the lives of many, and the law seeks to deter individuals from committing such actions.

The charges against Alan Colie were not only severe but also drew significant public and media attention. The incident sparked debates about the ethics of prank videos and the potential dangers they pose. However, the legal focus was on Colie’s actions and whether they were a justified response to the perceived threat. The Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office took the lead in the investigation, urging witnesses and anyone with information to come forward. As the legal proceedings unfolded, many awaited the trial’s outcome, which would undoubtedly set a precedent for similar cases in the future.

The Deadlock and the Verdict

During the trial, the jury was presented with evidence from both the prosecution and the defense. The defense argued that Colie acted in self-defense, feeling threatened by Cook’s actions. They emphasized that Cook’s prank was designed to provoke and that Colie felt menaced by Cook, who stood at 6-foot-5. The confrontation between the two lasted less than 30 seconds, with Cook approaching Colie and holding a cellphone close to his face, broadcasting a phrase multiple times through a Google Translate app. Colie repeatedly asked Cook to stop and tried to back away, but Cook persisted. The situation escalated when Colie attempted to knock the phone away and subsequently drew his gun, shooting Cook in the lower left chest.

The prosecution, on the other hand, argued that the facts did not support a self-defense claim. They pointed out that Cook’s prank, while bizarre, was not inherently threatening. The law requires that for a self-defense claim to be valid, the defendant must reasonably fear imminent danger of bodily harm and use no more force than necessary. The prosecution questioned how Colie could have felt such fear from a prank involving a silly phrase on a phone.

After about five hours of deliberation, the jury sent out a note indicating they were “divided in terms of whether the defendant acted in self-defense.” This deadlock was significant, as it showed the jury’s struggle to determine whether Colie’s actions were justified as self-defense or if they were malicious. Loudoun County Circuit Court Judge Matthew Snow urged the jury to continue their deliberations in light of this deadlock.

Despite the deadlock on the self-defense issue, the jury eventually reached a decision. Alan Colie was acquitted of the main charge of aggravated malicious wounding. However, the jury remained split on two lesser firearms counts, deciding to convict him on one and acquit him on the other. Colie’s defense attorney, Adam Pouilliard, argued that the conviction on the firearms charge was inconsistent with the law, especially given Colie’s acquittal on self-defense grounds. A hearing was scheduled for the following month to address this issue.

Despite the trial’s outcome, Tanner Cook expressed his intention to continue making prank videos, stating, “We’re gonna continue the videos. It is what it is.”

The case drew significant attention due to the intersection of self-defense rights, the potential dangers of pranks, and the influence of social media on modern society.

Need Help? Call Us Now!

Do not forget that when you or anyone you know is facing a criminal charge, you have us, the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, by your side to help you build the best defense case for you. We will work and be in your best interest for you and we will obtain the best possible outcome that can benefit you. We can explain everything you need to know about your trial and how to defend your case best. We can help you step by step through the criminal process. 

Therefore, do not hesitate to call us if you find yourself or someone you know that is facing criminal charges unsure about the court system. We will work with you to give you the best type of defense that can help you solve your case. It is vital to have someone explain the result of the charge to you and guide you in the best possible way.

Here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, we have professional and knowledgeable criminal law attorneys who are experienced in building a defense case for you that suits your needs for the best possible outcome that can benefit you.  

Also, here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, you are given a free consultation at your convenience. You may choose to have your appointment via Zoom, google meet, email, or an in-person appointment; and we will provide you with as much advice and information as possible so you can have the best possible result in your case. 

Alan Colie FAQs

Select a question from the dropdown below to reveal the answer:

Categories: Uncategorized

Share this article

Category

Categories