...

A Daring Lie: Shameless Disability Claims To The V.A.

Man Scams V.A. Benefits

Christopher Stultz, a 49-year-old man from Antrim, New Hampshire, was involved in a deceitful scheme that exploited the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (V.A.) for over $660,000 in benefits by falsely claiming a disability.

In January 2003, Stultz misled the V.A. into believing that he had lost the use of his feet, which led the department to classify him as “100% disabled” and subsequently increase his monthly V.A. benefits. This declaration of total disability also made him eligible for additional support through the V.A.’s Automobile Adaptive Equipment program, which assists mobility-impaired individuals with the purchase of specially adapted vehicles.

The Investigation into Stultz Claim

The investigation into Christopher Stultz’s fraudulent disability claims was a comprehensive and multi-faceted effort that involved surveillance, medical reviews, and witness testimonies. When suspicions arose regarding the legitimacy of Stultz’s disability claims, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (V.A.) and other federal agencies-initiated a thorough investigation to determine the veracity of his assertions of being unable to use his feet and requiring a wheelchair for mobility.

Surveillance Operations

A critical component of the investigation was direct surveillance of Stultz’s activities in public spaces. This was conducted to assess his mobility and daily functioning, given his claims of severe disability. On multiple occasions, investigators observed Stultz engaging in activities that directly contradicted his claims.

Notably, witnesses saw him using a wheelchair in V.A. medical facilities but observed him standing and walking unaided as soon as he left. For example, after visiting the V.A. Medical Center in Boston, witnesses saw Stultz stand from his wheelchair, load it into his car, and then walk around various stores in a shopping mall without any apparent difficulty. A similar behavior pattern was recorded after he visited a V.A. facility in Manchester, New Hampshire.

Medical Record Analysis

The investigation also involved a thorough review of Stultz’s medical records, both from the V.A. and any external healthcare providers. This review aimed to cross-reference his claimed disabilities with medical evidence and professional evaluations. Investigators sought to determine if there was a medical basis for his claims and if his reported symptoms and limitations were consistent with the findings of healthcare professionals.

Witness Testimonies

Witness testimonies played a significant role in the investigation. Individuals who knew Stultz or had interacted with him were interviewed to gather insights into his day-to-day mobility and any use of assistive devices. These testimonies revealed that several people who had known Stultz over the years had never seen him use a wheelchair or exhibit the severe disabilities he claimed. This information further cast doubt on the legitimacy of his claims.

The culmination of these investigative efforts painted a clear picture of deceit. The surveillance footage showing Stultz’s unaided mobility, the lack of corroborating medical evidence, and the contradicting witness testimonies all contributed to exposing the fraudulent nature of his disability claims. This comprehensive approach ensured that investigators had a well-rounded understanding of Stultz’s actual condition, leading to the charges and his eventual guilty plea for making false statements to receive disability benefits.

Witness testimonies further confirmed that Stultz had not used a wheelchair or other mobility aids since the early 2000s, casting more doubt on his disability claims. This fraudulent behavior led to a guilty plea by Stultz in federal court to one count of making false statements, with his sentencing scheduled for May 6. He now faces the possibility of up to five years in prison and three years of supervised release, as per the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. This case highlights the serious consequences of defrauding veteran support programs and the importance of integrity in claims for disability benefits.

What Was He Charged With?

The U.S. Attorney’s Office charged Christopher Stultz with one count of making false statements, a serious federal offense highlighting the gravity of his actions. Authorities brought this charge against him after an investigation showed that Stultz deceitfully claimed an inability to use his feet, leading the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (V.A.) to classify him as 100% disabled.

The charge of making false statements to a federal agency is a significant one, as it directly undermines the integrity of federal programs and the trust placed in individuals who receive support from such programs. In Stultz’s case, his actions not only defrauded the government of substantial funds but also potentially diverted resources away from veterans who legitimately need and deserve support. The charge reflects the serious breach of legal and ethical standards, highlighting the importance of honesty and accuracy in all communications with federal agencies, especially those providing critical support to veterans.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office’s decision to charge Stultz with making false statements highlights its commitment to upholding the integrity of veteran benefits and holding those who try to defraud the system accountable.

The maximum prison term of five years that accompanies this charge is indicative of the severity with which the justice system views such transgressions. This charge and the subsequent legal proceedings serve as a deterrent to others who might consider engaging in similar fraudulent activities, reinforcing the message that the federal government is vigilant in investigating and prosecuting fraud against veteran support programs and other federal initiatives.

How Did He Plea?

Christopher Stultz pleaded guilty to the charge of making false statements to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (V.A.), a serious federal offense that carries significant legal consequences. This plea was entered in the U.S. District Court, acknowledging his deliberate deception in claiming disability benefits to which he was not entitled. Stultz’s admission of guilt was a pivotal moment in the case, marking the culmination of an investigation that unveiled his fraudulent activities spanning over two decades.

The act of pleading guilty to making false statements implies that Stultz admitted to knowingly providing false information to the V.A. with the intent of receiving disability benefits under false pretenses. His claim, which began in 2003, involved the assertion that he was unable to use his feet, leading the V.A. to classify him as 100% disabled. This classification significantly increased his monthly benefits and qualified him for additional support, including funds to adapt vehicles to his supposed needs.

The Guilty Plea

Stultz’s guilty plea was a critical development in the legal proceedings, as it directly acknowledged his wrongdoing and acceptance of responsibility for his actions. By admitting to making false statements, he conceded to manipulating the system to obtain over $660,000 in benefits fraudulently. This admission not only expedited the legal process by potentially avoiding a prolonged trial but also highlighted the severity of defrauding veteran support programs.

The guilty plea has significant implications for Stultz, including potential sentencing considerations.

The charge of making false statements can lead to a maximum penalty of five years in prison, but the actual sentence depends on various factors such as the defendant’s acceptance of responsibility, the extent of the fraud, and its effect on the V.A. and the resources meant to help veterans in genuine need. By admitting guilt, Stultz sets himself up for sentencing, during which the court will decide the full extent of the consequences for his actions.

How Does One Make Claims To V.A. For Benefits?

Claiming disability benefits from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (V.A.) involves a detailed and structured process designed to ensure that only eligible veterans receive the support they need.The process involves a thorough review of medical evidence, service records, and the disability’s effect on the veteran’s life.

Initial Preparation

The first step for a veteran considering a disability claim is to gather all necessary documentation. This includes medical records, both from military service and civilian doctors, that relate to the conditions for which they are claiming disability. Service records must document any injuries or conditions claimed during service, making them crucial. Veterans should gather and present detailed evidence to demonstrate their disabilities’ extent and origin.

Filing the Claim

You can file in several ways: online via the V.A.’s eBenefits portal or by mail using a printed and completed V.A. Form 21-526EZ, in person at a V.A. office, or with the assistance of an accredited representative or Veterans Service Organization (VSO). When filing the claim, veterans must clearly state the disabilities they are claiming and provide as much evidence as possible to support their claim.

V.A. Review Process

Once submitted, the V.A. reviews the claim, verifying the veteran’s service history and examining the provided medical evidence. The V.A. might also schedule Compensation & Pension (C&P) exams for the veteran, which V.A. healthcare professionals or V.A.-contracted providers conduct. These exams aim to assess the severity of the veteran’s conditions and their connection to service.

Rating Decision

After reviewing all evidence and the results of any C&P exams, the V.A. makes a decision on the claim. Each disability is given a rating from 0% to 100%, in increments of 10%, based on its severity and the impact it has on the veteran’s ability to work. The V.A. uses the Schedule for Rating Disabilities to determine these percentages. The combined ratings for multiple disabilities determine the overall level of disability and the amount of compensation.

Notification and Appeals

The V.A. notifies the veteran of the decision. If the claim is approved, the notification will include the disability rating and the amount of monthly benefits the veteran will receive. If the claim is denied, or if the veteran disagrees with the rating, they have the option to appeal the decision. The appeals process can involve several steps, including a request for reconsideration, a Board of Veterans’ Appeals hearing, and potentially, an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

The V.A. designs the disability benefits claiming process to be thorough and fair, aiming to ensure veterans receive the benefits their service-connected disabilities entitle them to. The system’s complexity guarantees a merit-based evaluation of each claim, emphasizing the importance of supporting evidence and proper documentation.

Need Help? Call Us Now!

Do not forget that when you or anyone you know is facing a criminal charge, you have us, the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, by your side to help you build the best defense case for you. Working diligently in your best interest, our team strives to secure the most favorable outcome for you.

We will thoroughly explain everything you need to understand about your trial and the most effective defense strategies. You will receive assistance at every step of the criminal process to ensure comprehensive support throughout.

Therefore, do not hesitate to call us if you find yourself or someone you know that is facing criminal charges unsure about the court system. We will work with you to give you the best type of defense that can help you solve your case. It is vital to have someone explain the result of the charge to you and guide you in the best possible way.

Here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, our professional and knowledgeable criminal law attorneys specialize in crafting defense cases tailored to your needs for the most beneficial outcomes.

Additionally, we offer a complimentary consultation at your convenience. Whether you prefer a Zoom, Google Meet, email, or an in-person meeting, we’re here to provide you with ample advice and information to secure the best possible result for your case.

Call us now at (281) 810-9760.

Book an appointment with Law Office of Bryan Fagan using SetMore

Emerging Allegations Of Veteran Officer Surprising Excessive Force

Guardianship Of Veterans In Texas

What Happens To a V.A. Loan After Divorce?

Does the V.A. help veterans with their wills?

Handling your child support duties as a disabled veteran in Texas

Who is Considered a VA Beneficiary?

Am I Entitled to My Husband’s VA Benefits If He Dies?

FAQs about Christopher Stultz’s

Select a question from the dropdown below to reveal the answer:

Share this article

Category

Categories

Contact Law Office of Bryan Fagan, PLLC Today!

At the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, PLLC, the firm wants to get to know your case before they commit to work with you. They offer all potential clients a no-obligation, free consultation where you can discuss your case under the client-attorney privilege. This means that everything you say will be kept private and the firm will respectfully advise you at no charge. You can learn more about Texas divorce law and get a good idea of how you want to proceed with your case.

Plan Your Visit

Office Hours

Mon-Fri: 8 AM – 6 PM Saturday: By Appointment Only

"(Required)" indicates required fields