Esmeralda Upton, a 59-year-old resident of Plano, Texas, gained widespread notoriety following her involvement in a racially charged altercation in August 2022. Before this incident, Upton was relatively unknown to the public, but her actions during the confrontation at Sixty Vines restaurant brought significant attention to her background and personal history.
Esmeralda Upton’s case serves as a stark reminder of the persistent issues of racism and xenophobia in contemporary America. Her actions and the subsequent legal proceedings highlight the need for continued efforts to combat hate crimes and promote tolerance and understanding across diverse communities. The incident not only impacted the victims but also shed light on the broader societal challenges of prejudice and discrimination that still prevail.
How She Self-Identified
Upton self-identified as a “first generation” American during her initial interaction with the police, though she later clarified that she was “second generation.” She described herself as Mexican-American and Native-American, emphasizing her diverse ethnic heritage. This background, however, starkly contrasted with the racially prejudiced behavior she exhibited during the incident. Upton also mentioned her affluent lifestyle, citing her residence in a $1.5 million home, which suggests a comfortable socioeconomic status. This detail emerged during her rant to the police, possibly as an attempt to assert her status or mitigate her culpability.
The Incident
The incident involving Esmeralda Upton, which took place on August 24, 2022, outside the Sixty Vines restaurant in Plano, Texas, began with a confrontation between Upton and a group of South Asian women. According to the arrest affidavit and the subsequent viral video, the altercation started when Upton approached the women and began yelling racial slurs. She told the women to “go back to India” and accused them of ruining the country. The group of women, taken aback by the unprovoked verbal attack, started recording the incident on their phones.
Upton’s hostility escalated when she noticed she was being recorded. She continued her tirade, hurling more racial insults and threats at the women. At one point, Upton struck one of the women, a fact she later admitted to the police. The video also captured Upton making threats to shoot the women, saying, “I swear to God I’m going to shoot your a–.” This level of aggression and the racial nature of her comments were shocking and highlighted the deeply rooted prejudice driving her actions.
Her Behavior In Front Of Police
Upton’s behavior did not improve when law enforcement arrived on the scene. She remained “very agitated and uncooperative,” continuing to make racially charged remarks even in the presence of the officers. Upton told the police that she was a “first generation” American, but later claimed to be “second generation,” identifying herself as Mexican-American and Native-American. She mentioned living in a $1.5 million home, seemingly attempting to justify or mitigate her actions through her personal background and status.
The Evidence That Was Provided
Her admission of striking one of the women and her explicit threats, recorded on video, provided incontrovertible evidence of her culpability. Upton’s refusal to de-escalate the situation or show remorse highlighted a lack of self-awareness and accountability.
The police report and video evidence painted a clear picture of a racially motivated attack. Upton’s threats and physical aggression were driven by her bias against the victims’ race and national origin. The situation escalated from verbal harassment to physical assault and threats of violence, making it a significant hate crime case. The disturbing nature of Upton’s behavior and her refusal to cooperate with law enforcement underscored the severity of the incident, leading to her conviction on multiple hate crime charges. This case not only brought to light the personal prejudices held by Upton but also highlighted the broader issues of racism and intolerance that continue to affect communities.
The Arrest Of Upton
Esmeralda Upton’s arrest was a direct result of her violent and racially charged outburst outside the Sixty Vines restaurant in Plano, Texas, on August 24, 2022. The women, shocked and intimidated by her aggressive behavior, began recording the incident on their phones. These recordings would later play a crucial role in Upton’s arrest and the charges brought against her.
The situation quickly escalated from verbal harassment to physical assault when Upton struck one of the women. Additionally, she issued a series of threats, including stating, “I swear to God I’m going to shoot your a–.” These threats, coupled with her aggressive demeanor, created a clear and immediate danger, prompting the victims to call the police.
When law enforcement officers arrived at the scene, Upton’s belligerent behavior continued. She remained agitated and uncooperative, further incriminating herself with her continued racially charged comments and refusal to de-escalate the situation. The police officers, witnessing her conduct and reviewing the video evidence provided by the victims, had ample grounds to arrest her on the spot. The arrest affidavit detailed her aggressive behavior and threats, including her admission of striking one of the women because they were recording her.
How The Evidence Proved Her Admission In Court
In court, the video evidence played a central role in securing Upton’s conviction. The clear documentation of her actions and words left little room for defense and firmly established her guilt. Upton’s subsequent guilty plea to the charges, including three misdemeanor assault charges and one misdemeanor charge of terroristic threat, reflected the overwhelming strength of the evidence against her. The videos were a decisive factor in ensuring that justice was served and that Upton was held accountable for her racially motivated attack.
These videos not only captured the extent of Upton’s aggressive behavior but also provided irrefutable evidence of the hate crime she committed. The recordings began when Upton approached the women and launched into a tirade of racial slurs, telling them to “go back to India” and accusing them of “ruining the country.” The videos show Upton’s escalating anger as she hurls insults and threats at the women. This clear, visual documentation of her words and actions was crucial because it left no room for ambiguity or denial regarding her intent and the nature of her aggression.
As the confrontation continued, the videos captured Upton striking one of the women, an act that she later admitted to when speaking with the police. Her physical assault, combined with her racially charged comments, formed a comprehensive account of the incident that was undeniable. The footage also included Upton making explicit threats, such as “I swear to God I’m going to shoot your a–,” which significantly contributed to the terroristic threat charges she faced. The clarity and detail in these recordings ensured that every aspect of her hateful conduct was documented.
The Video Corroborated With The Victims Statements
When the police arrived on the scene, the videos served as immediate, concrete evidence of Upton’s actions. The officers reviewed the footage, which corroborated the victims’ statements and Upton’s own admissions. Her continued agitation and racially charged comments in front of the police further validated the claims made by the victims and strengthened the case against her. The arrest affidavit included references to the videos, which were instrumental in demonstrating the hate crime elements of her behavior.
Beyond their impact on the immediate legal response, the videos were also widely shared on social media, sparking public outrage and bringing national attention to the incident. This public visibility highlighted the broader issue of racially motivated violence and intolerance, prompting discussions on the prevalence of hate crimes and the need for societal change. The viral nature of the recordings underscored the power of visual evidence in not only achieving justice for the victims but also in raising awareness and driving conversations about racism and xenophobia.
What Authorities Charged Her With Officially
Esmeralda Upton faced multiple charges following her racially motivated assault on a group of South Asian women outside the Sixty Vines restaurant in Plano, Texas, on August 24, 2022. Her aggressive behavior, captured on video, led to her arrest and subsequent prosecution on several serious charges, reflecting the gravity of her actions.
Misdemeanor Assault
The authorities charged Upton with four state hate crime offenses, including three misdemeanor assault charges and one misdemeanor charge of terroristic threat. The assault charges arose directly from her physical attack on the women, as she struck one of them during the confrontation. Moreover, this violent act, combined with her aggressive demeanor and use of racial slurs, made the assault charges particularly egregious. Additionally, the videos clearly showed Upton’s unprovoked attack, providing compelling evidence to support these charges.
Terroristic Threat
The terroristic threat charge was based on Upton’s explicit threats of violence during the incident. In the recorded footage, she threatened to shoot the women, saying, “I swear to God I’m going to shoot your a–.” Such a threat, delivered in the context of a racially charged confrontation, elevated the severity of her actions to a level that warranted this additional charge. The terroristic threat charge underscored the fear and intimidation Upton inflicted upon the victims, reflecting the potential for deadly violence implied by her words.
Hate Crime Charges
Texas enhanced all four charges under its hate crime statute, which recognizes and penalizes offenses motivated by bias against the victim’s race, ethnicity, or national origin. They applied this hate crime enhancement because Upton’s actions were clearly driven by her prejudice against the women’s South Asian heritage. As a result, the enhancement significantly impacts the legal consequences, signaling a zero-tolerance stance against such racially motivated violence.
Pleading Guilty
After authorities arrested Upton, they processed her through the Collin County legal system. She eventually pleaded guilty to all four charges, acknowledging her role in the hate crime. As a result of her guilty plea, the court sentenced her to two years of community supervision probation and 40 days in the Collin County Jail. Additionally, the judge fined her $500 for each charge, which further emphasized the punitive measures taken against her.
Upton’s case highlighted the importance of addressing hate crimes with the full weight of the law. The charges brought against her not only reflected her immediate actions but also served to denounce the underlying racial prejudice that fueled her behavior. By prosecuting Upton under the hate crime statute, the legal system reinforced its commitment to protecting individuals from racially motivated attacks and promoting a more inclusive and tolerant society. This case served as a poignant reminder of the ongoing need to combat racism and uphold justice for all victims of hate crimes.
Need Help? Call Us Now!
Do not forget that when you or anyone you know is facing a criminal charge, you have us, the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, by your side to help you build the best defense case for you. We will work and be in your best interest for you and we will obtain the best possible outcome that can benefit you.
Our team is here to explain your trial, guiding you through the criminal justice process with clarity and support every step of the way. If you’re navigating the complexities of criminal charges and the court system seems daunting, reach out.
Therefore, do not hesitate to call us if you find yourself or someone you know that is facing criminal charges unsure about the court system. We will work with you to give you the best type of defense that can help you solve your case. It is vital to have someone explain the result of the charge to you and guide you in the best possible way.
Here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, our professional and knowledgeable criminal law attorneys build a defense case that suits your needs, aiming for the best possible outcome to benefit you.
Also, here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, you are given a free consultation at your convenience. You may choose to have your appointment via Zoom, google meet, email, or an in-person appointment; and we will provide you with as much advice and information as possible so you can have the best possible result in your case.
Call us now at (281) 810-9760.
Other Related Articles
Hate Crime Legislation in Texas: Definitions, Enforcement, and Community Impact
Sentencing Disparities in Drug Cases: Racial and Socioeconomic Factors
Understanding Hate Crime Prosecution in Illinois: A Comprehensive Guide
Racial Disparities In Drug Possession Arrests
The Impact of Racial Profiling on Drug Arrests in Texas
Esmeralda Upton FAQ
Select a question from the dropdown below to reveal the answer:
Hey there! My name is Olivia Ramirez, I graduated from Sam Houston State University with a bachelor’s of science in Psychology. I can’t help but scour the web for crime news and interesting stories. I write mostly true crime, anything from white collar crimes to the tragic murders across America. I try to mix in local news updates with big hitting scandals.
When I’m not typing away or searching for crime news, you’ll find me in bookstores looking for the new books to add to my backlog. Hanging out with my family or just relaxing with some cozy games to unwind from the day.
