Skip to content 
Financial Misconduct At The Wynn
Wynn Las Vegas, a subsidiary of Wynn Resorts, agreed to forfeit over $130 million, marking one of the largest forfeitures by a casino based on admissions of criminal wrongdoing. The case centered on the casino’s involvement in conspiring with unlicensed money transmitting businesses to facilitate illegal financial transactions. Through this conspiracy, Wynn Las Vegas enabled foreign gamblers to move significant sums of money into the U.S. while circumventing U.S. laws designed to detect and report suspicious financial activities. Third-party agents, acting as unregistered money transmitters, conducted these actions, helping foreign patrons access funds for gambling while avoiding the required financial reporting requirements.
The Wynn Las Vegas settlement case is a significant example of how financial misconduct and regulatory breaches can lead to severe legal consequences, even for well-established and reputable businesses. In this case, Wynn Las Vegas, a subsidiary of Wynn Resorts, agreed to forfeit over $130 million to settle criminal allegations that it had conspired with unlicensed money transmitting businesses to facilitate illegal financial transactions. This is the largest forfeiture of its kind, based on criminal admissions by a casino, and underscores the importance of adhering to strict financial regulations.
The Investigation Into The Wynn
The investigation into Wynn Las Vegas by Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) was part of a large-scale effort to uncover illicit financial activities involving unlicensed money transmitting businesses. This probe revealed that the casino conspired with these businesses to facilitate illegal money transfers for its foreign patrons, ultimately leading to a settlement where Wynn Las Vegas forfeited over $130 million. The investigation, assisted by IRS-Criminal Investigations and the DEA, highlighted multiple methods the casino used to circumvent financial regulations, including the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) laws.
The investigation revealed that these convoluted transactions allowed foreign gamblers to evade both U.S. and foreign financial laws, effectively laundering millions of dollars through the casino. Juan Carlos Palermo, an independent agent, facilitated over 200 transfers totaling $17.7 million for more than 50 foreign patrons. He specifically designed these transactions to help foreign gamblers bypass regulatory oversight, allowing them to move money into the U.S. without detection.
Employees And Supervisors Were In On It
Wynn Las Vegas employees, with the knowledge of their supervisors, facilitated these transactions without reporting suspicious activities, further enabling the illegal movement of funds. The case resulted in the largest forfeiture by a casino based on criminal wrongdoing and served as a strong reminder of the legal responsibilities casinos hold in preventing financial crimes. The investigation not only brought to light the illegal activities but also set a precedent for federal oversight in the gaming industry to ensure compliance with financial laws.
Used Third Party Agents
Third-party agents are individuals or entities that operate independently from the primary business they serve, acting as intermediaries to perform specific tasks or services on behalf of that business. In the context of financial transactions, these agents are often hired to facilitate the movement of money, recruit clients, or handle administrative duties that the primary business may not be able or willing to manage directly. These agents operate outside the formal structure of the company, yet they play a crucial role in helping the business achieve its objectives. In many cases, third-party agents are specialists in particular industries or regions and possess knowledge, contacts, or resources that the hiring company lacks.
Meant To Recruit Foreign Gamblers
In the case of Wynn Las Vegas, third-party agents were primarily hired to recruit foreign gamblers and facilitate the transfer of large sums of money from international locations to the casino. These agents, often operating as unlicensed money transmitters, helped foreign patrons bypass the conventional financial system, including laws and regulations like the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) requirements. The agents were responsible for ensuring that foreign gamblers had access to funds for gambling or debt repayment at Wynn Las Vegas, often using complicated, opaque methods to move money across borders.
Strong Connections To Latin America And Asia
Typically, businesses that engage third-party agents do so for several reasons. One of the most common motivations is the agent’s access to clientele or resources in specific regions. In the case of Wynn Las Vegas, these agents had strong connections in markets like Latin America and Asia, allowing the casino to tap into a broader pool of high-rolling international gamblers. Additionally, third-party agents can act as intermediaries to shield the primary business from direct involvement in questionable or high-risk transactions, thus creating a buffer of plausible deniability.
The Methods They Used
Wynn Las Vegas employed several illicit methods to transmit money through unlicensed channels to facilitate the gambling activities of its foreign patrons. One of the primary schemes was dubbed “Flying Money” (also known as Qian Chen). This method involved an unlicensed money processor who collected U.S. dollars in cash from third-party individuals in the United States and delivered the funds to a patron of Wynn Las Vegas who otherwise had no access to cash in the U.S. The recipient of the cash would then electronically transfer an equivalent value in foreign currency from their foreign bank account to an account designated by the money processor. For this service, the patron paid the processor a percentage of the total transferred amount. This allowed patrons to bypass official financial institutions and evade scrutiny by authorities, creating a system that went undetected by anti-money laundering (AML) regulations.
Human Head/Hat
Another illicit method Wynn used was the “Human Head” or “Human Hat” gambling scheme (ren tou in Mandarin). In this setup, a person, acting as a proxy (the “Human Head”), would physically purchase chips and gamble at the casino, but under the direction of another individual nearby. This other person, often the true patron, could not or would not engage in financial transactions themselves due to regulatory restrictions, such as the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) or AML laws. The actual gambling decisions were made by the true patron, while the Human Head physically placed the bets, allowing the patron to conceal their identity and financial activities.
How It Violated The Bank Secrecy Act And The Anti-Money Laundering
The actions taken by Wynn Las Vegas, as revealed in the investigation, directly violated both the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) laws, which are essential components of U.S. financial regulation. These laws were enacted to prevent financial institutions, including casinos, from becoming conduits for illicit activities such as money laundering, terrorism financing, and other financial crimes.
The Bank Secrecy Act
The BSA, in particular, requires businesses to keep records of large cash transactions, report suspicious financial activities, and implement programs designed to prevent illegal money transfers. Failure to comply with these laws not only exposes businesses to criminal liability but also threatens the integrity of the financial system as a whole.
Wynn Las Vegas violated these laws by facilitating complex money transfers through unlicensed third-party agents, allowing foreign gamblers to move large sums of money without proper scrutiny or reporting. These transactions bypassed the traditional financial systems that are designed to monitor and flag suspicious activities. In this case, the casino’s decision to turn a blind eye to these transactions and actively participate in the schemes was a clear violation.
Anti-Money Laundering
AML laws, which were created to deter and detect money laundering, were also blatantly disregarded. Wynn Las Vegas failed to ensure that the funds it was handling were derived from legitimate sources, instead facilitating money transfers that were hidden through layers of unregistered agents and shell companies.
By violating both the BSA and AML laws, Wynn Las Vegas effectively allowed its casino to become a vehicle for illegal financial transactions. This undermined the purpose of these laws, which aim to protect the financial system from being used to launder money or fund criminal enterprises. The casino’s failure to comply with these regulations not only put the company at risk but also posed a broader threat to the integrity of the U.S. financial system.
The Settlement For The Wynn
The settlement that Wynn Las Vegas reached with the U.S. government is a landmark case in the casino industry, both for the size of the forfeiture and for the legal admissions involved. Wynn Las Vegas agreed to forfeit over $130 million to settle allegations that it had conspired with unlicensed money transmitting businesses to facilitate illegal financial transactions.
This settlement marked one of the largest forfeitures ever made by a casino for criminal wrongdoing. Instead of facing criminal prosecution, the casino entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice. Under the terms of this agreement, Wynn Las Vegas admitted to its role in using third-party agents to circumvent U.S. and foreign financial laws but avoided further criminal penalties by cooperating with the investigation and agreeing to the forfeiture.
Had To Severed Ties With Third Party Agents
As part of the settlement, Wynn Las Vegas severed ties with the third-party agents involved in the illegal transactions and acknowledged that some of its former employees had violated both internal policies and the law. The company emphasized that the settlement was the final step in a long-standing effort to resolve legacy issues and refocus on its future operations.
The forfeiture, while not classified as a fine, represented the full amount of money involved in the illegal transactions. This agreement allowed Wynn Las Vegas to avoid further criminal prosecution, but it also sent a clear message that even large, established businesses would be held accountable for financial misconduct.
Need Help? Call Us Now!
Do not forget that when you or anyone you know is facing a criminal charge, you have us, the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, by your side to help you build the best defense case for you. We will work and be in your best interest for you and we will obtain the best possible outcome that can benefit you.
Our team is here to explain your trial, guiding you through the criminal justice process with clarity and support every step of the way. If you’re navigating the complexities of criminal charges and the court system seems daunting, reach out.
Therefore, do not hesitate to call us if you find yourself or someone you know that is facing criminal charges unsure about the court system. We will work with you to give you the best type of defense that can help you solve your case. It is vital to have someone explain the result of the charge to you and guide you in the best possible way.
Here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, our professional and knowledgeable criminal law attorneys build a defense case that suits your needs, aiming for the best possible outcome to benefit you.
At the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, we offer a free consultation at your convenience. You can schedule your appointment via Zoom, Google Meet, email, or in person. We provide comprehensive advice and information to help you achieve the best possible result in your case.
Call us now at (281) 810-9760.
Other Related Articles
Astonishing Murder In The Daniel Rodimer’s Case
Unraveling the MGM Grand Cyberattack
Legal Options and Rights for Spouses of Gamblers in Texas
Las Vegas Under Fire: Survival Of Campus Shooting
Strange Protest: Protestor Risky Climb Of The Las Vegas Sphere
Wynn Las Vegas Settlement FAQs
Select a question from the dropdown below to reveal the answer:
