Sheryl Ann Sidall: Closure Brought by Canine Detectives

Who Sheryl Ann Siddall?

Sheryl Ann Siddall is a 57-year-old woman from Liberty County who went missing and hasn’t been heard from for nearly two weeks. The Liberty County Sheriff’s Office, along with Texas Search and Rescue, and cadaver dogs, have been actively searching for her, especially near her residence in the Horseshoe Lake Estates neighborhood. The search efforts have been extensive.

Cadaver dogs and sonar equipment have been used to search the lake behind her home, and the dogs have also been deployed to search the surrounding properties. The urgency of the search was highlighted by LCSO Captain David Meyers, who mentioned the hope of bringing resolution and closure for the family.

The initial alarm was raised when a deputy from the sheriff’s office visited Siddall’s home on September 18th. This visit was prompted by her family’s report that they couldn’t locate her and she wasn’t responding to phone calls. The last known communication with her was on September 12th.

During the visit, the deputy encountered a man named Donald Lee Hassler, aged 52, at the property. Hassler gave consent to search the home. During this search, a concerning discovery was made: a blood stain on the kitchen floor. This prompted the deputy to call for further investigation.

Hassler provided a statement to the investigators, claiming he was in the process of buying the house from Siddall. He also mentioned that Siddall had told him she was leaving to visit family out of state. However, this claim was suspicious as Siddall’s car, purse, and other personal belongings were still at the house. Additionally, her phone’s last known location was detected from a nearby cell tower.

Further investigations revealed evidence suggesting that something might have been dragged into Horseshoe Lake, which is located adjacent to Siddall’s backyard.

It’s worth noting that Hassler is a parolee. He was arrested on a charge of being a felon in possession of firearms and was subsequently jailed. As of the information provided, no other charges have been filed against him.

Who Is Donald Lee Hassler?

Donald Lee Hassler is a 52-year-old individual who has become a significant figure in the investigation surrounding the disappearance of 57-year-old Sheryl Ann Siddall from Liberty County, Texas. Here’s a detailed overview:

Donald Lee Hassler was present at Siddall’s residence when the Liberty County Sheriff’s Office conducted a welfare check after Siddall was reported missing. Hassler claimed to be in the process of purchasing the house from Siddall and stated that she had left to visit her sister in Oklahoma. However, this claim raised suspicions as Siddall’s personal belongings, including her car and purse, were still at the residence. Moreover, her phone’s last known location was detected from a nearby cell tower.

During the welfare check, investigators discovered a bloody knife and human bloodstains inside Siddall’s home. Additionally, human blood was found inside a boat that appeared to have been dragged from her home to Horseshoe Lake, which is adjacent to Siddall’s property. This lake backs up directly to Siddall’s home, and her family had not heard from her since September 12.

Hassler, who is known to be a parolee, has a history of several burglary charges. He was arrested on an unrelated charge of being a felon in possession of firearms. He is currently detained in the Fort Bend County Jail without bond, awaiting a court appearance.

Siddall’s family has expressed that they were unfamiliar with Hassler prior to this incident. Siddall’s niece, Amanda Turner, emphasized Siddall’s love for her home by the water and her family, particularly her grandchildren. Turner stated that the idea of Siddall willingly giving up her home is inconceivable.

While Hassler has not been charged in connection with Siddall’s disappearance, the Liberty County District Attorney’s Office has indicated that they are considering filing murder charges against him. This consideration is significant, as it’s uncommon to pursue murder charges without the discovery of a body. Hassler has invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and has sought legal representation.

The ongoing investigation and the evidence found at Siddall’s home have placed Hassler at the center of this case. Authorities are working diligently to uncover the truth behind Siddall’s disappearance and to ensure justice is served.

What Is A Welfare Check?

A welfare check, often referred to as a well-being check, is a vital procedure carried out by law enforcement agencies or other pertinent authorities when there’s a concern about an individual’s safety or overall well-being.

This action is typically initiated when someone hasn’t been seen or heard from for an unusually long time, or when there are worries about their physical or mental health. Such checks can also be prompted by suspicions of abuse, neglect, or when someone’s behavior or circumstances seem out of the ordinary, raising alarms among neighbors, friends, or family members. Additionally, certain situations, like extreme weather events, power outages, or other emergencies, can necessitate a welfare check, especially if an individual is believed to be at risk.

During the process, officers might knock on the person’s door, converse with neighbors, or even enter the residence if there’s substantial reason to believe the person might be in a dire situation. The primary objective of a welfare check is to ascertain the safety and condition of the person involved. If the officers discover that the individual is in need of help, they are equipped to offer immediate assistance, summon medical aid, or link the individual with the appropriate social services to ensure their continued safety and well-being.

In the realm of criminal law, prosecuting a murder case without a body is one of the most challenging endeavors. Historically, the absence of a body made it difficult to prove that a crime had even occurred, let alone identify the perpetrator. The underlying belief was that without a body, there was no conclusive evidence of death. However, advancements in forensic science, technology, and investigative techniques have shifted this perspective.

How effective are cadaver dogs?

Cadaver dogs, trained specifically to detect the scent of decomposing bodies, have become an invaluable tool in the search for human remains. Their rigorous training equips them to identify not just the scent of a full body but also nuances like bones, blood, and even tiny fragments of decomposition.

While pinpointing a definitive accuracy rate for these dogs is challenging due to the myriad of real-world variables, studies in controlled environments have reported their accuracy to be as high as 95% or more. However, several factors can influence this accuracy in practical scenarios.

Environmental conditions, such as weather, soil type, and the presence of other animals, can either aid or hinder a dog’s ability to detect a scent. Additionally, the period since the individual’s death can impact the strength and detectability of the scent; while older remains can still be detected, fresher remains often present a more potent scent. The training and experience of both the dog and its handler play a pivotal role in the success of the search. A seasoned handler’s ability to accurately interpret the dog’s signals can significantly enhance the chances of locating remains. However, it’s crucial to understand that cadaver dogs, despite their training, are not infallible.

Instances of false positives and negatives can occur. In the legal realm, the indications provided by cadaver dogs have been presented as evidence, but their reliability can sometimes be contested and might necessitate additional corroborative evidence.

In essence, while cadaver dogs offer a remarkable capability in the search for human remains, they are most effective when viewed as a complementary tool, used in tandem with other investigative methods and evidence.

Evidence in No-Body Homicide Cases

While the discovery of a body provides tangible evidence of a crime, no-body homicide cases rely heavily on circumstantial evidence. This can include physical evidence like bloodstains, DNA, fingerprints, or other forensic evidence that suggests a violent encounter. Witness testimony like statements from individuals who might have seen or heard something related to the crime. Electronic evidence that can include phone records, emails, or social media activity that can indicate a victim’s sudden and unexplained absence. And even behavioral patterns like the sudden disappearance of an individual without any logical explanation, especially if they leave behind personal belongings, can be indicative.

In the case of Sheryl Ann Siddall, the discovery of a bloody knife and human bloodstains in her home, combined with her sudden and unexplained disappearance, provides compelling evidence that a crime might have occurred.

Challenges In No-Body Homicide Cases

The primary challenge in such cases is convincing a jury of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt without a body. The defense can argue that without concrete evidence of death, there’s a possibility that the alleged victim might still be alive. Therefore, the prosecution must build a robust case, demonstrating that the victim’s absence can only be explained by foul play and that the defendant is responsible.

Donald Lee Hassler And The Siddall Case

In the context of Sheryl Ann Siddall’s disappearance, Donald Lee Hassler’s presence at her home, combined with the discovery of blood evidence, places him at the center of the investigation. Hassler’s statements to the authorities, such as his claim of buying the house from Siddall and her supposed trip to visit family, raise suspicions, especially when juxtaposed against the physical evidence and the family’s testimonies.

The Liberty County District Attorney’s Office’s consideration of murder charges against Hassler, even without Siddall’s body, underscores the gravity of the evidence at hand. It suggests that the authorities believe they have a strong enough case to convince a jury of Hassler’s potential involvement in Siddall’s presumed death.

While no-body homicide cases present unique challenges, they are not insurmountable. The combination of circumstantial evidence, forensic findings, and witness testimonies can build a compelling narrative of what might have transpired. In the case of Sheryl Ann Siddall, the evidence points towards a grim scenario, and Donald Lee Hassler’s potential involvement is under intense scrutiny. As the investigation unfolds, the legal system will determine if the evidence is robust enough to charge and potentially convict Hassler of murder, even in the absence of Siddall’s body. The pursuit of justice, in this case, exemplifies the legal system’s commitment to holding individuals accountable, irrespective of the challenges posed by the absence of direct evidence.

How Could This Charge Potentially Affect Donald?

Donald Lee Hassler, being on parole and now facing a potential murder charge in connection with the disappearance of Sheryl Ann Siddall, finds himself in a particularly precarious legal situation. When a parolee, like Hassler, is charged with a new and grave crime such as murder, it immediately triggers a violation of their parole conditions, which typically mandate adherence to all laws.

This violation often leads to their swift arrest and detention, potentially without the option for bail due to the severity of the alleged crime. Beyond this immediate consequence, Hassler would be slated for a parole revocation hearing, a process distinct from the criminal trial associated with the murder charge.

During this hearing, the parole board would assess whether Hassler breached the terms of his parole. A determination of violation could result in Hassler being sent back to prison to complete his original sentence.

Concurrently, he would undergo the legal proceedings for the murder charge, encompassing arraignment, potential bail hearings, pre-trial motions, and possibly a trial. If convicted, Hassler would receive a new prison sentence for the murder, which might run consecutively to any time he’s mandated to serve for the parole violation.

This cumulative sentencing could significantly prolong his incarceration. Some jurisdictions even impose enhanced penalties for crimes committed while on parole, which could further extend Hassler’s potential sentence. Given the intertwined complexities of the parole and criminal justice systems, it’s imperative for Hassler to secure expert legal representation to navigate the challenges ahead. In essence, the intersection of his parole status and the new murder charge amplifies the legal hurdles and potential consequences he faces.

Need Help? Call Us Now!

Do not forget that when you or anyone you know is facing a criminal charge, you have us, the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, by your side to help you build the best defense case for you. We will work and be in your best interest for you and we will obtain the best possible outcome that can benefit you. We can explain everything you need to know about your trial and how to defend your case best. We can help you step by step through the criminal process. 

Therefore, do not hesitate to call us if you find yourself or someone you know that is facing criminal charges unsure about the court system. We will work with you to give you the best type of defense that can help you solve your case. It is vital to have someone explain the result of the charge to you and guide you in the best possible way.

Here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, we have professional and knowledgeable criminal law attorneys who are experienced in building a defense case for you that suits your needs for the best possible outcome that can benefit you.  

Also, here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, you are given a free consultation at your convenience. You may choose to have your appointment via Zoom, google meet, email, or an in-person appointment; and we will provide you with as much advice and information as possible so you can have the best possible result in your case. 

Call us now at (281) 810-9760.

Book an appointment with Law Office of Bryan Fagan using SetMore

Jennifer Ann Crecente: A Tragic Love Story

In a divorce, don’t leave your furry friend’s fate to a judge

Trump Indictment: Analyzing the Legal Developments and Implications

How To Get a Child Back from Non-Custodial Parent

In the Shadow of the Mafia: The Hunt for Matteo Messina Denaro

Privacy Breached: Coles Charles Corrigan

A Silent Danger: Understanding and Preventing Deaths in Hot Cars

FAQs on Sheryl Ann Siddall

FAQs on Sheryl Ann Siddall

Select a question from the dropdown below to reveal the answer:

Share this article



Related Articles

Relevant questions to ask a family law attorney in Texas

What is spousal spying?

Help! My ex-spouse kidnapped my child

Four important child support factors in Texas

Contact Law Office of Bryan Fagan, PLLC Today!

At the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, PLLC, the firm wants to get to know your case before they commit to work with you. They offer all potential clients a no-obligation, free consultation where you can discuss your case under the client-attorney privilege. This means that everything you say will be kept private and the firm will respectfully advise you at no charge. You can learn more about Texas divorce law and get a good idea of how you want to proceed with your case.

Office Hours

Mon-Fri: 8 AM – 6 PM Saturday: By Appointment Only

"(Required)" indicates required fields