Revealing the Truth: The Tragic Murder Of Susann Sills

Staged Murder Of Susann Sills

The tragic case of Susann Sills’ murder by her husband, Eric Scott Sills, in San Clemente, California, is a chilling example of a meticulously staged crime designed to mislead authorities and evade justice. Eric Sills, a respected doctor, employed his medical knowledge and understanding of forensic evidence to craft a scenario that initially appeared as a tragic accident.

On the morning of November 13, 2016, Eric Sills reported to the authorities that he had discovered his wife, Susann, lifeless at the bottom of the stairs in their home. He portrayed the scene as an accidental fall, suggesting that Susann had tragically succumbed to injuries sustained from tumbling down the staircase. This initial portrayal of events was critical in setting the stage for what he intended to be perceived as an unforeseen and tragic accident.

The choice of the staircase as the purported site of the accident was not arbitrary. Staircase falls are relatively common domestic accidents and can result in severe injuries or death, making it a plausible explanation for an unattended death in a home. By positioning Susann’s body at the bottom of the stairs and calling emergency services with a narrative of an accidental fall, Eric aimed to direct the investigation towards a tragic mishap rather than a criminal act.

However, the forensic evidence contradicted this staged narrative. The autopsy and subsequent investigation revealed that Susann’s injuries were inconsistent with those typically sustained in a fall down the stairs. Instead, they indicated a more sinister cause of death: strangulation. Additionally, bloodstains and a clump of Susann’s hair were found in their daughter’s bedroom, not near the staircase, suggesting that a violent struggle had taken place there, not on the stairs as Eric had claimed.

The staging of the crime scene was a calculated attempt by Eric Sills to use his medical knowledge and understanding of injuries to create a believable cover-up for his heinous act. His choice of a common household accident as the supposed cause of death was a strategic move to exploit the everyday nature of such incidents, aiming to deflect suspicion away from himself. However, the meticulous work of the investigators uncovered the truth behind the staged accident, revealing the grim reality of a premeditated murder.

The Investigation

The police investigation into the death of Susann Sills, led by the Orange County homicide detectives, unraveled a complex and disturbing case that ultimately led to the conviction of her husband, Eric Scott Sills, for her murder. Initially presented as an accidental death, the investigation meticulously peeled back the layers of deception to reveal a premeditated murder.

When Eric Sills reported his wife’s death on November 13, 2016, he claimed to have found Susann’s lifeless body at the bottom of the stairs in their home, suggesting an accidental fall. However, the police quickly began to suspect foul play. The first red flag was the inconsistency between the nature of Susann’s injuries and Eric’s account of a fall. The autopsy results were pivotal; they indicated that Susann had not died from injuries consistent with a fall down the stairs, but rather from strangulation.

Further investigation revealed more discrepancies and suspicious details. Bloodstains were found in their daughter’s bedroom, where Susann had been sleeping due to a migraine, not near the staircase where her body was found. This suggested that the actual site of the altercation and subsequent murder was the bedroom, not the stairs. Additionally, a clump of Susann’s hair was found in the room, indicating a violent struggle.

The detectives delved into the couple’s personal life, uncovering underlying marital issues. Text messages from Susann to Eric indicated a troubled relationship, with Susann expressing a desire to leave and feeling trapped and harmed by Eric. This provided a possible motive for the murder, contradicting the initial portrayal of a happy marriage.

The investigation also scrutinized Eric Sills’ actions and behavior following the incident. His demeanor, statements to the police, and actions in the days after Susann’s death were carefully examined for inconsistencies and signs of guilt.

In conclusion, the police investigation was thorough and methodical, effectively dismantling the initial appearance of an accidental death. The detectives’ ability to identify and interpret key pieces of forensic evidence, coupled with their examination of the couple’s personal life, led to the revelation of a premeditated murder, meticulously staged to appear as a tragic accident. This comprehensive investigation was crucial in bringing Eric Sills to justice for the murder of his wife, Susann.

The Arrest

The decision to arrest Eric Sills was not taken lightly. It was the culmination of exhaustive investigative work, careful analysis of forensic evidence, and a thorough examination of the couple’s relationship dynamics. When the authorities finally moved to arrest Eric, it was with a solid foundation of evidence that pointed overwhelmingly to his guilt.

Eric Sills’ arrest sent shockwaves through the community, particularly given his standing as a medical professional. It was a stark reminder that appearances can be deceiving and that the truth behind a seemingly accidental death can be far more complex and sinister. The arrest was a testament to the diligence and persistence of the investigators in uncovering the truth and seeking justice for Susann Sills.

The Evidence

The trial of Eric Sills for the murder of his wife, Susann Sills, was a complex legal proceeding that hinged on a variety of evidence presented by both the prosecution and the defense. The evidence played a crucial role in shaping the narrative of the case, guiding the jury towards their eventual verdict.

Prosecution’s Evidence

The prosecution’s case was built on a foundation of forensic evidence, which was central to disproving Eric Sills’ initial claim that his wife’s death was an accidental fall down the stairs. The autopsy report was a key piece of evidence, revealing that Susann’s cause of death was strangulation, not injuries consistent with a fall. This directly contradicted Eric’s account and suggested a more sinister scenario.

Further forensic analysis provided additional support for the prosecution’s case. Bloodstains were found in the couple’s daughter’s bedroom, where Susann had been sleeping due to a migraine, rather than near the staircase. This indicated that the scene of the crime was likely the bedroom, not the stairs. Additionally, the presence of a clump of Susann’s hair in the room suggested a violent struggle had taken place.

The prosecution also delved into the couple’s personal life, presenting evidence of marital discord. Text messages and emails between Susann and Eric were scrutinized, some of which indicated that Susann felt trapped in the marriage and was considering leaving. This evidence was used to establish a motive for the murder.

Defense’s Evidence

The defense, in contrast, aimed to create reasonable doubt about Eric’s guilt. They might have challenged the interpretation of the forensic evidence, suggesting alternative explanations for the findings. For instance, they could have argued that the bloodstains and hair were the result of an accidental injury due to a fall, possibly related to Susann’s migraines.

The defense also had the opportunity to present character witnesses or other evidence to bolster Eric’s credibility and paint him in a more positive light. They might have highlighted his professional achievements and reputation, or his role as a father, to counter the negative portrayal by the prosecution.

The evidence presented at the trial was critical in determining the outcome. The prosecution’s focus on forensic evidence aimed to establish a clear narrative of murder, while the defense sought to introduce doubt and alternative explanations. The jury’s decision ultimately hinged on how convincingly each side presented its case and the strength of the evidence they provided. The trial was a stark reminder of the importance of thorough investigation and careful analysis in the pursuit of justice.

The Sentencing Of Eric Scott Sills

The sentencing and potential appeal in the case of Eric Sills, convicted of the second-degree murder of his wife, Susann Sills, marked the culmination of a highly charged and complex legal process. He faces a maximum sentence of 15 years to life in prison, his sentencing hearing is set for march 15.

The sentencing phase, following the guilty verdict, was a critical juncture where the consequences of Eric’s actions were formally addressed, and the possibility of an appeal loomed as a subsequent legal recourse.

Sentencing Phase

In the sentencing phase, the court considered various factors to determine the appropriate punishment for Eric Sills. These factors likely included the nature and circumstances of the crime, Eric’s background and character, and the impact of the crime on the victim’s family, particularly the couple’s children. In cases of second-degree murder, sentences can vary significantly, but they typically involve many years to life in prison.

During this phase, both the prosecution and defense had opportunities to present arguments and evidence to influence the judge’s decision. The prosecution would have emphasized the severity of the crime, the evidence of premeditation, and the impact on Susann’s family and community. Victim impact statements, often a powerful component of the sentencing phase, would have provided the court with a direct understanding of the emotional and psychological toll of the crime.

The defense, meanwhile, might have sought to mitigate the sentence by presenting factors in Eric’s favor. This could include his previous contributions to society, lack of criminal history, and any expressions of remorse or understanding of the gravity of his actions.

Appeal Process

Following sentencing, Eric Sills had the right to appeal the conviction. In an appeal, the defense would not reargue the facts of the case but rather focus on legal errors that may have occurred during the trial. These could include issues with how evidence was admitted or interpreted, jury instructions, or other procedural matters. The appeal process is a critical aspect of the judicial system, ensuring that the trial was conducted fairly and in accordance with the law.

The outcome of an appeal can vary. It could result in the upholding of the original verdict, a new trial, or, in some cases, a reduction in the sentence. The appeal process is typically lengthy, involving careful review and consideration by appellate courts.

In summary, the sentencing of Eric Sills was a moment of reckoning, reflecting the gravity of his crime and its impact. The potential appeal represented his legal team’s effort to challenge the conviction, a common step in the criminal justice system that underscores the importance of procedural fairness and the right to contest a court’s decision.

Need Help? Call Us Now!

Do not forget that when you or anyone you know is facing a criminal charge, you have us, the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, by your side to help you build the best defense case for you. We will work and be in your best interest for you and we will obtain the best possible outcome that can benefit you. Also, we can explain everything you need to know about your trial and how to defend your case best. We can help you step by step through the criminal process. 

Therefore, do not hesitate to call us if you find yourself or someone you know that is facing criminal charges unsure about the court system. We will work with you to give you the best type of defense that can help you solve your case. It is vital to have someone explain the result of the charge to you and guide you in the best possible way.

Here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, we have professional and knowledgeable criminal law attorneys who are experienced in building a defense case for you that suits your needs for the best possible outcome that can benefit you.  

Also, here at the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, you are given a free consultation at your convenience. You may choose to have your appointment via Zoom, google meet, email, or an in-person appointment; and we will provide you with as much advice and information as possible so you can have the best possible result in your case. 

Call us now at (281) 810-9760.

Book an appointment with Law Office of Bryan Fagan using SetMore

The Evolution of Forensic Science and Its Impact on Evidence Exhibits

Advancing Justice through Scientific Investigation

Understanding the Different Degrees of Murder in Texas


Unsolved Murders: Seeking Answers in Cold Cases

The Murder of Athena: From Disappearance To Heartbreaking Resolution

The Unusual Story Behind A Merciless Murder-for-Hire Plot

The Kaitlin Armstrong Trial: Love Triangle Turns Murder

Echoes of Conroe: The Chilling Case of Dr. Talat Jehan Khan’s Murder

FAQs on the Eric Sills Case

Select a question from the dropdown below to reveal the answer:

Share this article



Contact Law Office of Bryan Fagan, PLLC Today!

At the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, PLLC, the firm wants to get to know your case before they commit to work with you. They offer all potential clients a no-obligation, free consultation where you can discuss your case under the client-attorney privilege. This means that everything you say will be kept private and the firm will respectfully advise you at no charge. You can learn more about Texas divorce law and get a good idea of how you want to proceed with your case.

Plan Your Visit

Office Hours

Mon-Fri: 8 AM – 6 PM Saturday: By Appointment Only

"(Required)" indicates required fields