Can Common Law Marriage be Backdated / Is Obergefell Retroactive?

The 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court case was a landmark moment in civil rights, granting same-sex couples the constitutional right to marry and ensuring they receive the same legal protections as heterosexual couples, including hospital visitations, inheritance, and adoption rights. This historic ruling reaffirmed the belief that love knows no bounds, regardless of sexual orientation. When dealing with common law marriages, it’s essential to understand the specific regulations, including whether these marriages can be backdated. If you have common law marriage questions, seek clarity on how your relationship is recognized under state law and what legal rights you may have.

Yet, amidst this groundbreaking progress, a complex question lurks in the shadows: Can common law marriage be retroactively applied to same-sex couples who were together before the Obergefell decision? This query is not just a legal conundrum; it’s a matter of love, commitment, and the recognition of relationships that existed in a time when legality was not on their side.

The Story of Alfonso and Brad

Introducing Alfonso and Brad, a couple whose story vividly represents the challenges encountered by many same-sex couples. Their journey together began in 2007, a bond forged in love and deepened through shared life experiences. By 2008, in the midst of a housing crisis, they made the practical decision to move in together, intertwining their lives in ways that went beyond shared closets and pets. They celebrated holidays together, supported each other’s careers, and to the world, they were husbands, complete with wedding bands on their fingers.

However, despite living a life akin to a married couple, they never legally tied the knot. Financial constraints and life’s relentless pace kept their dream wedding on hold. As Alfonso ascended in his medical career and Brad built a robust teaching portfolio, their need for a formal ceremony seemed less pressing.

But in 2016, their world was rocked. Brad discovered Alfonso’s infidelity, leading to a heartbreaking separation. Here emerges the legal quandary: Brad seeks to divorce Alfonso, claiming a common-law marriage. Alfonso refutes this, stating they were never legally married and questioning the applicability of common law marriage given the recency of the Obergefell ruling. Were they, in the eyes of the law, common-law married?

What is Common Law Marriage?

To unravel this, we first need to understand what common law marriage is. In essence, common law marriage is an informal type of marriage, recognized in some states, where a couple is considered legally married, despite not having a marriage license or a formal ceremony. States like Texas, Colorado, Iowa, and a few others recognize this form of union.

The criteria for a common law marriage can vary, but typically it includes living together for a significant period, presenting yourselves as a married couple, and having the intention to be married. In Alfonso and Brad’s case, they seemingly tick all these boxes – shared residence, societal acknowledgment as husbands, and mutual intent to be a lifelong couple.

00:00

Play

The Central Debate: Is Obergefell Retroactive?

Now, we plunge into the heart of the matter: the retroactivity of Obergefell in the context of common law marriage. The question boils down to this: should the ‘marriage clock’ for Alfonso and Brad start ticking in 2008, when they began their life together, or in 2015, post-Obergefell?

If the clock starts in 2015, their union falls short of the timeline typically required for common law marriage. But if it starts in 2008, then they have more than fulfilled the duration requirement. This isn’t just a matter of time; it’s about the acknowledgment of a committed relationship that existed before the law caught up.

This debate isn’t merely academic; it has real-life implications for couples like Alfonso and Brad. It’s about the recognition of love and commitment that existed in a pre-Obergefell world, and whether the law can extend its arm back in time to give these relationships their due status. The answer to this not only shapes the lives of numerous couples but also echoes the ongoing journey towards true equality under the law.

Federal Perspective: Key Legal Cases

Ranolls v. Dewling: A Retroactivity Milestone

The case of Ranolls v. Dewling stands as a cornerstone in understanding the retroactive application of legal principles. Here, the courts grappled with whether prior relationships should be recognized post-factum, following a significant change in law. This case, while not about same-sex marriage, set a legal precedent in viewing retroactivity for personal rights. It balanced respect for existing laws with evolving civil rights.

Ford v. Freeman: Relevance to Same-Sex Marriage

In Ford v. Freeman, the courts delved into the complexities surrounding the recognition of relationships that predated a significant legal change. Ford v. Freeman explored the recognition of pre-change relationships. It’s crucial for same-sex marriage, examining new legal standards for existing relationships. The decision is crucial for couples like Alfonso and Brad, as it determines how pre-Obergefell relationships will be perceived.

State Perspective: Texas Case Study

Hinojosa v. Lafredo: A Texas Turning Point
Turning to the state level, the Hinojosa v. Lafredo case serves as a critical study in how individual states interpret the retroactivity of federal rulings like Obergefell. In Texas, a state known for its distinct stance on common law marriage, this case shed light on the complexities surrounding same-sex relationships that predated Obergefell. The verdict in Hinojosa v. Lafredo holds significant implications for couples in Texas, potentially setting a precedent for how other states might navigate similar issues.

Confusion and Legal Intricacies in Texas

The aftermath of Obergefell in Texas highlights the confusion and legal challenges inherent in applying a new legal framework retrospectively. The state’s unique legal landscape, combined with varying interpretations of Obergefell, creates a tapestry of legal uncertainties for couples seeking recognition of their pre-2015 relationships.

Legal Analysis and Expert Insights

In dissecting the legal principles and court decisions related to the retroactivity of Obergefell, it’s crucial to delve into the subtleties of constitutional law, civil rights, and the evolving nature of relationship recognition. Legal experts and practitioners bring invaluable insights into this discussion, highlighting the challenges in applying a contemporary understanding of rights to past relationships. Their analysis underscores the tension between legal consistency and the dynamic nature of social progress.

The Verdict: Understanding the Complexity

As we stand today, the legal standing on whether Obergefell is retroactive remains a complex and multi-layered question. Different jurisdictions interpret the ruling’s retroactive application in varied ways, reflecting the ongoing debates and evolving legal landscape. This complexity not only affects the lives of couples like Alfonso and Brad but also signifies the broader challenges faced in the journey toward equal rights. The verdict, as it stands, is not a clear-cut answer but a reflection of the nuanced and ever-evolving nature of the law.

Implications for Same-Sex Couples

The landscape of legal interpretations following the Obergefell decision presents both challenges and opportunities for same-sex couples who have been together before the landmark ruling. The key implication is the uncertainty around the recognition of their relationship status, especially for those who may have considered themselves in a common-law marriage.

• Recognition and Rights: For couples like Alfonso and Brad, the retroactive application of Obergefell could mean the acknowledgement of their relationship as a marriage, with all the attendant legal rights and benefits, years before the ruling. This includes tax benefits, inheritance rights, and spousal privileges in legal and medical decisions.
• Legal Complications: However, this recognition also brings complications. It could affect everything from property ownership to parental rights, particularly in cases where the legal status of the relationship was ambiguous before 2015. In some jurisdictions, the recognition of a pre-Obergefell relationship as a marriage could have significant retroactive legal implications.
• Navigating Legalities: For those navigating these waters, a proactive approach is essential. It’s advisable to:
• Seek Legal Counsel: Consult with attorneys who specialize in LGBTQ+ family law. They can provide personalized advice based on the couple’s specific circumstances and the legal context of their state.
• Document Relationship History: Gather evidence of the relationship’s longevity and nature, such as shared assets, joint financial decisions, or affidavits from friends and family. This can be crucial in states where common-law marriage criteria are applicable.
• Stay Informed: Keep abreast of ongoing legal developments in this area, as laws and interpretations continue to evolve.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the journey of Alfonso, Brad, and countless other couples through the evolving legal landscape post-Obergefell underscores a critical chapter in the fight for LGBTQ+ rights. As same-sex marriages gain legal recognition, understanding the nuances of common law marriage—particularly whether these marriages can be backdated—becomes essential. Common law marriage questions remain pertinent for couples navigating this complex terrain.

The ongoing interpretation of marriage laws, including the retroactivity of Obergefell, holds significant implications for these couples, highlighting the importance of legal clarity and the recognition of diverse relationship forms. Moving forward, it is crucial for courts to address the retroactive application of marriage recognition, ensuring that all couples, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity, receive the equal protection and respect they deserve.

If you want to know more about what you can do, CLICK the button below to get your FREE E-book: “16 Steps to Help You Plan & Prepare for Your Texas Divorce”

If you want to know more about how to prepare, CLICK the button below to get your FREE E-book: “13 Dirty Tricks to Watch Out For in Your Texas Divorce, and How to Counter Them” Today!”

Other Articles you may be interested in:

1. Texas Common Law Marriage and Divorce: Your Questions Answered
2. How Texas Courts Handle Bigamy and Polygamy in Family Law Cases
3. Does Texas Recognize Common Law Marriage? What You Need to Know About Legal Rights
4. Common Questions about Texas Prenuptial and Marital Agreements
5. Should I sign a Texas Premarital or Prenuptial Agreement?
6. My Fiancé wants me to sign a Texas Prenup. What should I do?
7. Making Postnuptial Agreements Stick in a Texas Divorce
8. Attacking the Enforceability of a Premarital Agreement in a Texas Divorce
9. Dower Contracts and a Texas Divorce
10. Dangers of Common Law Marriage with Estate Planning
11. Why do police marriages fail?
12. Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Texas Marriage
13. What living arrangements may lead a judge to conclude that you are common law married?