Skip to content 
Who Is The Liver King?
The Liver King scandal centers on Brian Johnson, a social media influencer whose extreme “ancestral” lifestyle sparked widespread debate over the question: Is Liver King a fraud? He built a massive following by promoting a diet of raw animal organs, including liver, bull’s testicles, and cow’s lungs, while showcasing a highly muscular physique he claimed came solely from these practices. Those claims became the foundation of his online persona and the source of both his fame and later controversy.
The Scandal Of Steroids
However, the authenticity of Liver King’s claims came into question when leaked emails suggested that he was spending around $11,000 a month on steroids. This revelation contradicted his assertions of attaining his muscular build purely through his diet and lifestyle. The leaked emails exposed him as a heavy steroid user, which sparked widespread criticism and backlash from his followers and the wider online community.
Johnson, who had amassed millions of followers on platforms like TikTok, faced significant scrutiny following these revelations. He built his entire brand around the claim that he achieved a robust physique through natural means, specifically by following a diet he described as based on ancestral eating habits. The scandal not only questioned his personal credibility but also cast doubt on the effectiveness and authenticity of the diet he promoted.
The Criticism For Hiding Steroid Use
The backlash against Brian Johnson intensified because many followers felt personally deceived. He built his brand on the promise of achieving an extraordinary physique through natural, ancestral living, so the steroid revelations struck at the heart of his credibility.
Much of the outrage centered on three core issues:
• Misleading marketing: Johnson repeatedly claimed his physique came from diet and discipline alone, which encouraged followers to believe supplements and lifestyle choices were responsible for his results
• Broken trust: Followers invested time, money, and personal effort into following his methods, only to later discover the image was not what it seemed
• Harmful influence: Many young and impressionable fans tried to replicate extreme behaviors without knowing pharmaceutical enhancement played a major role
The scandal forced many people to reexamine how much faith they place in influencer claims, especially in fitness and health spaces where visual success often overshadows transparency.
25 Million Dollar Class Action Lawsuit
The legal fallout from the Liver King scandal went far beyond online backlash. Brian Johnson and his companies faced a major class action lawsuit that challenged the very foundation of his brand. The case alleged that Johnson misled consumers into buying his products by promoting a false narrative of natural fitness and ancestral living.
| Issue | Details |
|---|---|
| Defendant | Brian Johnson (The Liver King), The Fittest Ever LLC, Ancestral Supplements LLC |
| Plaintiff | Christopher Altomare, representing a class of consumers |
| Amount Sought | $25 million in damages |
| Core Allegation | Deceptive marketing and misleading claims about natural physique and product effectiveness |
| Steroid Use | Allegedly concealed while promoting products as the source of his results |
| Main Legal Argument | Customers were misled into believing his physique and health came solely from diet and supplements |
| Impact on Brand | Undermined the credibility of his ancestral lifestyle and supplement marketing |
| Broader Implications | Raised concerns about influencer accountability and consumer protection in the wellness industry |
Class Action Lawsuit
The class-action lawsuit represented a broader group of consumers who felt deceived by Johnson’s marketing tactics. These consumers had purchased Johnson’s products under the belief that they could achieve similar physical results through natural methods, as portrayed by Johnson. The lawsuit highlighted the potential consequences of deceptive marketing practices, especially in the health and wellness industry, where consumers often rely on the perceived authenticity and personal testimony of influencers.
Johnson’s admission of steroid use was a pivotal moment that fueled the lawsuit. His online persona and business model were heavily reliant on the narrative of achieving a primeval, robust physique through an ancestral diet, devoid of modern supplements or drugs. The revelation of his steroid use not only damaged his personal credibility but also raised serious questions about the legitimacy of his business practices.
The lawsuit’s implications extended beyond Johnson and his companies. It underscored the growing concerns about the reliability of health and fitness advice disseminated through social media platforms. Influencers like Johnson, who amass large followings and wield significant influence over consumer choices, face a heightened level of scrutiny regarding the authenticity of their claims and the transparency of their marketing practices.
As the legal battle unfolded, it remained crucial to monitor the developments and await the court’s final decision. The outcome of the Liver King class-action lawsuit stood to set an important precedent in influencer marketing, especially regarding the accountability and ethical responsibilities of social media figures who promote health-related products and lifestyles.
The Plaintiff: Christopher Altomare
Christopher Altomare emerged as a key figure in the legal battle against Brian Johnson, known as the Liver King, by filing a class-action lawsuit. Altomare, a resident of New York, took legal action against Johnson and his companies – Ancestral Supplements, LLC and The Fittest Ever, LLC. The lawsuit was a significant development in the unfolding controversy surrounding the Liver King, particularly after his admission of steroid use and the subsequent backlash.
Food-borne Illness
The lawsuit filed by Altomare was not just about the steroid scandal; it encompassed broader allegations against Johnson’s business practices. Altomare accused Johnson of deceptive marketing, claiming that he falsely advertised his supplement products and promoted a “dangerous and life-threatening diet.” This diet, heavily based on the consumption of raw animal organs, was alleged to have caused “severe” food-borne illnesses. The lawsuit sought to hold Johnson accountable for the potential health risks associated with his dietary recommendations and the misleading promotion of his supplements.
The Influence Of Social Media
Altomare’s legal action highlighted the growing concerns about the influence of social media personalities in the health and wellness sector. Johnson, through his Liver King persona, had gained a massive following by promoting an ancestral lifestyle, which included a specific diet and the use of his branded supplements. Altomare’s lawsuit brought to light the potential dangers of such influence when not backed by scientific evidence or when it involves misleading claims.
The case against Johnson, spearheaded by Altomare, was not just a personal grievance; it represented a larger group of consumers who felt deceived by the Liver King’s marketing tactics. These consumers had been led to believe that they could achieve significant health and fitness improvements by following Johnson’s advice and using his products. The lawsuit, therefore, had broader implications for consumer protection and the ethical responsibilities of influencers.
Ancestral Eating: Increased Chances Of Illness
The Liver King, known as Brian Johnson, faced significant controversy not only for his steroid use but also for promoting a diet that many experts considered unhealthy and potentially dangerous. His diet, which heavily featured the consumption of raw animal organs, raised concerns about the risks of foodborne illnesses and the overall nutritional balance.
Johnson’s diet was based on what he termed “ancestral eating,” which involved consuming raw liver, bull’s testicles, cow’s lungs, and other animal organs. This approach was marketed as a natural and primal way of eating, supposedly linked to the diets of our ancient ancestors. However, health experts have raised alarms about the risks associated with consuming raw meat and organs. These risks include exposure to bacteria like Salmonella and E. coli, parasites, and other pathogens that can cause serious foodborne illnesses.
The lawsuit against Johnson included concerns about the promotion of this diet. Plaintiffs argued that not only did Johnson deceive customers about his steroid use, but he also potentially endangered their health by advocating for a diet that contradicts established food safety guidelines. The consumption of raw animal products is generally discouraged by health authorities due to the high risk of contamination and illness.
The Responsibility Of Influencers
Moreover, the lawsuit highlighted the broader issue of influencers promoting health-related practices without adequate scientific backing or consideration of potential risks. Johnson’s large following and influential status meant that his dietary recommendations could have a significant impact on public behavior, potentially leading to harmful health outcomes.
The controversy surrounding the Liver King’s diet is part of a larger conversation about the responsibility of influencers in the health and wellness space. With the rise of social media, individuals like Johnson can rapidly gain a large audience and significant influence over their followers’ lifestyle choices. This influence comes with a responsibility to ensure that the information and practices being promoted are safe, healthy, and based on sound scientific principles.
The Supplements Were A Scam
The controversy surrounding the Liver King, Brian Johnson, extended beyond his diet and steroid use to include serious allegations about the supplements he promoted. These supplements, which were an integral part of his brand, came under scrutiny for potentially being a scam.
Johnson marketed his supplements as part of his ancestral lifestyle brand, claiming they could help users achieve a robust physique and better health through natural means. After he revealed his steroid use, those claims lost credibility and drew serious scrutiny. The lawsuit against Johnson alleged that he deceived customers by attributing his muscular build to these supplements and his diet, while in reality, it was steroid use that played a significant role.
This deception was particularly concerning because it potentially misled consumers into believing that they could achieve similar results by using these supplements. Many of Johnson’s followers purchased these products under the impression that they were a key factor in achieving a physique like the Liver King’s. The lawsuit argued that Johnson engaged in deceptive marketing by overstating the effectiveness of his supplements and misrepresenting their role in his physical development.
Vitamins and Supplements Scam
The controversy exposes a broader issue in the health and wellness industry, where companies often overstate the effectiveness of supplements and promote benefits that lack solid scientific support. In the case of the Liver King, the supplements were a part of a larger narrative that promised extraordinary health benefits through a return to ancestral practices. This narrative was compelling to many, but the lawsuit suggested that it was built on misleading claims.
The allegations against Johnson’s supplements serve as a reminder of the importance of scrutinizing health and wellness products, especially those promoted by influencers. Influencers often sway consumers with personal stories and an appearance of authenticity, but this case shows that those endorsements are not always reliable or truthful.
In the end, the controversy surrounding Brian Johnson leaves many still asking, is Liver King a fraud, not just because of his steroid admissions, but because of how deeply his brand relied on a narrative of natural, ancestral fitness. The scandal highlights how easily influence and image can blur the line between inspiration and deception, especially in the health and wellness space, where trust matters most. Whether viewed as a cautionary tale or a turning point in influencer accountability, the Liver King story serves as a reminder that bold claims deserve careful scrutiny and that transparency is essential when personal branding becomes a business.
Need Help? Call Us Now!
Do not forget that when you or anyone you know is facing a criminal charge, you have us, the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, by your side to help you build the best defense case for you. We will act in your best interest and pursue the strongest possible outcome for your case. We clearly explain your trial, your defense options, and guide you through each step of the criminal process with confidence and care.
Therefore, do not hesitate to call us if you find yourself or someone you know who is facing criminal charges unsure about the court system. We will work with you to give you the best type of defense that can help you solve your case. It is vital to have someone explain the result of the charge to you and guide you in the best possible way.
At the Law Office of Bryan Fagan, our skilled and knowledgeable criminal defense attorneys build strong, tailored defense strategies designed to meet your needs and achieve the best possible outcome for your case.
Also, the Law Office of Bryan Fagan provides free consultation at your convenience. You may choose to have your appointment via Zoom, Google Meet, email, or an in-person appointment, and we will provide you with as much advice and information as possible so you can have the best possible result in your case.
Call us now at (281) 810-9760.
Other Related Articles
- How To Protect Yourself From AI-Driven Phone Scams
- Trial by TikTok: When Social Media Influences Texas Criminal Cases
- Can You Be Arrested for What You Post? Social Media and Texas Criminal Law
- Prescription Drug Fraud Laws and Penalties In Texas (Video)
- Betrayal in Healing: Healthcare Fraud in the Pain Clinic
- From Crypto Titan to Convicted Fraudster: Sam Bankman-Fried
- Identity Theft vs. Identity Fraud: Unraveling the Differences
- The Multimillion-Dollar Healthcare Fraud
- Prescription Drug Fraud: Laws and Penalties In Texas
- Understanding the Mechanisms and Risks of Voter Fraud
Liver King FAQs
Yes. Brian Johnson, known as the Liver King, later admitted to using steroids after leaked emails revealed he was spending large sums on performance-enhancing drugs. This directly contradicted his public claims that he built his physique solely through diet and lifestyle. The revelation damaged his credibility and fueled legal and public backlash.
Yes, they can. When influencers promote products using deceptive or false claims, especially in health and wellness, consumers may have grounds for legal action. In the Liver King case, the lawsuit alleged deceptive marketing because customers purchased products believing he achieved his results naturally.
The class-action lawsuit alleged that Johnson and his companies misled consumers by hiding steroid use while marketing supplements and an ancestral lifestyle. Plaintiffs claimed they were induced to buy products based on false representations. The case focused on deceptive advertising and consumer protection violations.
The lawsuit did not claim the supplements were illegal, but it challenged how Johnson marketed them. The case focused on allegations that he exaggerated the supplements’ role in building his physique while concealing steroid use. This raised concerns that customers may have been misled about what the products could realistically achieve.
It highlights growing legal and ethical concerns around influencer marketing in health and fitness. Many consumers rely on personal branding and testimonials when making purchases. This case serves as a warning that influencers must be transparent and that misleading claims can lead to serious legal consequences.
